The Journal of Urology
Volume 186, Issue 6 , Pages 2498-2503, December 2011

Phallic Decoration in Paleolithic Art: Genital Scarification, Piercing and Tattoos

  • Javier C. Angulo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Carretera de Toledo Km 12.500, 28905 Getafe, Madrid, Spain (FAX: 34-916833271)
  • ,
  • Marcos García-Díez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prehistory, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria, Spain
  • ,
  • Marc Martínez

      Affiliations

    • Centre des Monuments Nationaux, Grotte de Pair-non-Pair, Prignac-et-Marcamps, France

Received 11 July 2011 published online 21 October 2011.

Purpose

The primitive anthropological meaning of genital ornamentation is not clearly defined and the origin of penile intervention for decorative purposes is lost in time. Corporeal decoration was practiced in the Upper Paleolithic period. We discuss the existing evidence on the practice of phallic piercing, scarring and tattooing in prehistory.

Materials and Methods

We studied the archaeological and artistic evidence regarding explicit genital male representations in portable art made in Europe approximately 38,000 to 11,000 years ago with special emphasis on decorations suggesting genital ornamentation.

Results

Archaeological evidence that has survived to our day includes 42 phallic pieces, of which 30 (71.4%) show intentional marks to a different extent with a probable decorative purpose. Of these ornamental elements 18 (60%) were recovered from the upper Magdalenian period (11,000 to 12,700 years ago) in France and Spain, and 23 (76.7%) belong to the category of perforated batons. Decorations show lines (70% of objects), plaques (26.7%), dots/holes (23.3%) or even human/animal forms (13.3%). These designs most probably represent skin scarification, cutting, piercing and tattooing. Notably there are some technical similarities between the motifs represented and some designs present in symbolic cave wall art. This evidence may show the anthropological origin of current male genital piercing and tattooing.

Conclusions

European Paleolithic art shows decoration explicitly represented in a high proportion of portable art objects with a phallic form that have survived to our day. Decorative rituals of male genital tattooing, piercing and scarification may have been practiced during Paleolithic times.

Key Words: penis, tattooing, surgery, Europe, archeology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(11)04507-1

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.077

The Journal of Urology
Volume 186, Issue 6 , Pages 2498-2503, December 2011