« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 4
, Pages 1267-1272
, October 2010
Relief of Stent Related Symptoms: Review of Engineering and Pharmacological Solutions
References
- . Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol. 1967;97:840
- Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;334:572
- Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;CD006029
- . Ureteric stents, far from ideal. Lancet. 2000;356:872
- Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol. 2003;169:1065
- Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol. 2003;169:1060
- Incontinence: Basics & Evaluation. Plymouth, United Kingdom: Health Publications Ltd; 2005;vol 1, p 10
- Application of paclitaxel-eluting metal mesh stents within the pig ureter: an experimental study. Eur Urol. 2007;51:217
- . Advances in ureteral stent design. J Endourol. 2003;17:195
- ‘Firm’ versus ‘soft’ double pigtail ureteric stents: a randomised blind comparative trial. Eur Urol. 1995;28:1
- A prospective randomized single-blind comparison of ureteral stents composed of firm and soft polymer. J Urol. 2005;174:2303
- Prospective randomised trial comparing the Bard Inlay™ ureteric stent with the Boston Scientific Polaris™ ureteric stent using the validated Ureteric Stent Symptom Questionnaire. BJU Int. 2008;101(suppl.):52
- Randomized evaluation of ureteral stents using validated symptom questionnaire. J Endourol. 2005;19:990
- . Impact of ureteral stent diameter on symptoms and tolerability. J Endourol. 2003;17:59
- Determining the appropriate length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent by both stent configurations and related symptoms. J Endourol. 2008;22:1427
- Effects of proximal and distal ends of double-J ureteral stent position on postprocedural symptoms and quality of life: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2007;21:698
- Clinical effectiveness of new stent design: randomized single-blind comparison of tail and double-pigtail stents. J Endourol. 2000;14:195
- Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort. J Urol. 2009;181:2581
- Evaluation of a chronic indwelling prototype mesh ureteral stent in a porcine model. Urology. 2000;56:857
- Use of a temporary ureteral drainage stent after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: results from a phase II clinical trial. J Urol. 2003;169:1682
- Next generation biodegradable ureteral stent in a Yucatan pig model. J Urol. 2010;183:765
- A novel drug eluting ureteral stent: a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a ketorolac loaded ureteral stent. J Urol. 2010;183:1037
- . A comparative in vitro study to determine the beneficial effect of calcium-channel and alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonism on human ureteric activity. BJU Int. 2006;98:651
- . Effect of smooth muscle relaxant drugs on proximal human ureteric activity in vivo: a pilot study. Urol Res. 2007;35:207
- Is there a role for alpha1-blockers in treating double-J stent-related symptoms?. Urology. 2006;67:35
- Alfuzosin to releave ureteral stent discomfort: a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2009;181:170
- Effect of tamsulosin in preventing ureteral stent-related morbidity: a prospective study. J Endourol. 2008;22:651
- . Effects of specific alpha-1A/1D blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent: a prospectively randomized study. Urol Res. 2009;37:147
- A prospective, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled comparison of extended release oxybutinin versus phenazopyridine for the management of postoperative ureteral stent discomfort. Urology. 2008;71:792
- Predictors of morbidity in patients with indwelling ureteric stents: results of a prospective study using the validated Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaire. BJU Int. 2010;Epub ahead of print
Nothing to disclose.
Editor's Note: This article is the second of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 1580 and 1581.
PII: S0022-5347(10)03818-8
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.043
© 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 4
, Pages 1267-1272
, October 2010

