The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 3 , Pages 865-872, September 2010

Surgical Management of Bilateral Synchronous Kidney Tumors: Functional and Oncological Outcomes

  • Matthew N. Simmons

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Center for Urologic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave. Q10-1, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 (telephone: 216-636-0066; FAX: 216-636-4492)
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Ricardo Brandina

      Affiliations

    • USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Adrian F. Hernandez

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Inderbir S. Gill

      Affiliations

    • USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Hansen Medical.

Received 11 January 2010 published online 20 July 2010.

Purpose

We evaluated renal functional and oncological outcomes after sequential partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy in patients with bilateral synchronous kidney tumors.

Materials and Methods

A total of 220 patients treated from June 1994 to July 2008 were included in the study. Estimated glomerular filtration rate, and overall, cancer specific and recurrence-free survival were assessed.

Results

Patients underwent sequential partial nephrectomy (134), partial nephrectomy followed by radical nephrectomy (60) or radical nephrectomy followed by partial nephrectomy (26). Final estimated glomerular filtration rate after bilateral surgery was 59, 36 and 35 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in these 3 groups, respectively (p <0.001). The order in which partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy were conducted did not affect functional outcomes. Overall survival of patients with bilateral cancer was 86% at 5 years and 71% at 10 years, cancer specific survival was 96% at 5 and 10 years, and recurrence-free survival was 73% at 5 years and 44% at 10 years. Overall survival was decreased in patients with tumors larger than 7 cm (p = 0.003). Patients with postoperative stage III or greater chronic kidney disease had decreased overall survival due to noncancer causes (p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Patients treated with sequential surgery for bilateral synchronous kidney tumors have 5 and 10-year oncological outcomes comparable to those of patients with unilateral kidney cancer. Decreased overall survival was significantly associated with tumor size larger than 7 cm and postoperative stage III or greater chronic kidney disease. Nephron sparing surgery should be conducted for all amenable bilateral kidney masses given the negative impact of renal functional decline on overall survival.

Key Words: carcinoma, renal cell, nephrectomy, treatment outcome, glomerular filtration rate

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CKD, chronic kidney disease, CSS, cancer specific survival, CT, computerized tomography, eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate, GFR, glomerular filtration rate, OS, overall survival, PN, partial nephrectomy, RCC, renal cell carcinoma, RFS, recurrence-free survival, RN, radical nephrectomy, SCr, serum creatinine, WIT, warm ischemia time

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 Editor's Note: This article is the third of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 1234 and 1235.

PII: S0022-5347(10)03561-5

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.042

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum , 15 November 2010

    The Journal of Urology January 2011 (Vol. 185, Issue 1, Page 365)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 3 , Pages 865-872, September 2010