The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 3 , Pages 1227-1228 , September 2010

Re: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Management for Asymptomatic Lower Pole Calculi: E. Yuruk, M. Binbay, E. Sari, T. Akman, E. Altinyay, M. Baykal, A. Y. Muslumanoglu and A. Tefekli J Urol 2010; 183: 1424–1428

References 

  1. Lambert EH, Walsh R, Moreno MW, et al. Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2010;183:580
  2. Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JC, et al. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol. 2006;20:537
  3. Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology; 2008;
  4. Mays N, Challah S, Patel S, et al. Clinical comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal calculi. BMJ. 1988;297:253
  5. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13:235
  6. Traxer O, Smith TG, Pearle MS, et al. Renal parenchymal injury after standard and mini percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 2001;165:1693

PII: S0022-5347(10)03529-9

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.010

The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 3 , Pages 1227-1228 , September 2010

Article Tools