The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 2 , Pages 610-615, August 2010

Functional Results After Tape Removal for Chronic Pelvic Pain Following Tension-Free Vaginal Tape or Transobturator Tape

  • Jérôme Rigaud

      Affiliations

    • Urology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Clinique Urologique, CHU Hôtel Dieu, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes 44000 France (telephone: 02-40-08-39-10; FAX: 02-40-08-39-22)
  • ,
  • Patrice Pothin

      Affiliations

    • Urology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Jacques Labat

      Affiliations

    • Urology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • Thibault Riant

      Affiliations

    • Pain Assessment and Treatment Centre, Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • Michel Guerineau

      Affiliations

    • Urology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
    • Neuro-traumatology Department, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
    • Pain Assessment and Treatment Centre, Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • Loïc Le Normand

      Affiliations

    • Urology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • Pascal Glemain

      Affiliations

    • Urology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • Roger Robert

      Affiliations

    • Neuro-traumatology Department, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • Olivier Bouchot

      Affiliations

    • Urology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France

Received 2 December 2009 published online 21 June 2010.

Purpose

The incidence of pelvic pain after placement of a suburethral sling for incontinence ranges between 0% and 30%. The management of this chronic pain after suburethral sling placement is complex and to our knowledge no consensus has been reached. We evaluated the functional results after removal of the suburethral tape responsible for chronic pelvic pain.

Materials and Methods

From November 2004 to August 2009, 32 patients undergoing removal of suburethral tape causing chronic pelvic and perineal pain at our department were prospectively followed. Patients were divided according to the type of suburethral sling into the transobturator tape group (15 patients) and the tension-free vaginal (retropubic) tape group (17 patients). In the TVT group tape removal was performed using transperitoneal laparoscopy in every patient. In the TOT group tape removal was performed via a transvaginal approach possibly associated with a unilateral or bilateral incision in the proximal part of the thigh. Pain was evaluated by a visual analogue scale from 0—no pain to 10—maximal pain.

Results

The surgical exploration of suburethral tape responsible for chronic, treatment refractory pelvic pain revealed in most cases an abnormal tape position or excessive tape traction. In the overall population tape removal provided improvement of pain (at least 50% improvement of the visual analogue scale score) in 68% with a mean followup of 10 months. Mean visual analogue scale score was 7.3 ± 1.5 before surgery and 3.4 ± 3 after surgery. However, recurrence of incontinence was observed in 22% of cases. No significant difference was demonstrated in terms of functional results according to the type of tape insertion.

Conclusions

The surgical removal of suburethral tape improved pain in 68% of patients but with a risk of recurrence of urinary incontinence in 22%.

Key Words: pain, suburethral slings, postoperative complications, surgical tape, urinary incontinence

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CT, computerized tomography, TOT, transobturator tape, TVT, tension-free vaginal tape, VAS, visual analogue scale

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(10)03259-3

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.132

The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 2 , Pages 610-615, August 2010