The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 1 , Pages 265-273, July 2010

Vesicoureteral Reflux Associated Renal Damage: Congenital Reflux Nephropathy and Acquired Renal Scarring

  • Caig Peters

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, University of Virginia Children's Hospital, P. O. Box 80422, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0422 (telephone: 434-924-9559; FAX: 434-982-3652
  • ,
  • H. Gil Rushton

Divisions of Pediatric Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, and Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

Received 23 December 2009 published online 17 May 2010.

Purpose

The pathophysiology, evaluation, description and clinical implications of renal damage associated with vesicoureteral reflux remain controversial. We summarized the current understanding of this important aspect of clinical vesicoureteral reflux.

Materials and Methods

We performed a detailed review of the literature on clinical, pathological and experimental data related to congenital vesicoureteral reflux and bladder dynamics. We also reviewed the clinical context and imaging evaluation with underlying experimental data related to post-infectious reflux nephropathy.

Results

Congenital reflux nephropathy is a pattern of impaired renal function and development with renal dysplasia as the most severe but not the only form. Mechanisms of developmental disruption are potentially related to vesicoureteral reflux dynamics during gestation and associated bladder dynamics, which may continue into postnatal life. Acquired renal injury associated with infection is related to particular bacterial and host factors that determine infection virulence, host inflammatory response and tissue recovery. As best seen on dimercapto-succinic acid scan, acute changes may resolve but may also persist as permanent renal scarring. Specific risk factors for acute pyelonephritis and renal scarring in patients with vesicoureteral reflux include higher reflux grade, dysfunctional voiding/elimination, recurrent pyelonephritic episodes and delayed initiation of antibiotic therapy. Low pressure sterile reflux is not a cause of reflux nephropathy.

Conclusions

Renal damage associated with vesicoureteral reflux may be congenital or acquired and the respective pathophysiological mechanisms are likely different. Congenital damage is often dysplasia, which may be a result of disordered renal development secondary to significant alterations in bladder dynamics. These processes may continue into the newborn period while kidney maturation continues. Recognizing the clinical potential for ongoing effects on renal function and the role of bladder development are important for clinical care. Post-pyelonephritic acquired damage is the result of a complex interaction of host and bacterial factors that leads to acute alterations in renal function, and may lead to permanent renal scarring. Strategies for timely intervention as well as prevention are essential to limit the risk of permanent renal injury, which may predispose to hypertension and renal insufficiency in some patients.

Key Words: urinary bladder, kidney, vesico-ureteral reflux, cicatrix, urinary tract infections

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CRN, congenital reflux nephropathy, DMSA, dimercapto-succinic acid, UTI, urinary tract infection, VUR, vesicoureteral reflux

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(10)03147-2

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.076

The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 1 , Pages 265-273, July 2010