The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 2 , Pages 709-714 , August 2010

Candidate Urinary Biomarker Discovery in Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Proteomic Approach

  • Hrair-George O. Mesrobian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Medical College and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: 999 N. 92nd St., Suite C 330, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53092 (telephone: 414-266-3769; FAX: 414-266-1752)
  • ,
  • Michael E. Mitchell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Medical College and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • William A. See

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Medical College and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Brian D. Halligan

      Affiliations

    • Biotechnology and Bioengineering Center, Medical College and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Brian E. Carlson

      Affiliations

    • Biotechnology and Bioengineering Center, Medical College and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Andrew S. Greene

      Affiliations

    • Biotechnology and Bioengineering Center, Medical College and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Bassam T. Wakim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biochemistry, Medical College and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Received 17 December 2009

References 

  1. Decramer S, Wittke S, Ross MM, et al. Predicting the clinical outcome of congenital unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in newborn by urinary proteome analysis. Nat Med. 2006;12:398
  2. Dillon HK. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Street experience. Br J Urol. 1998;81(suppl.):39
  3. Mesrobian HG. The value of newborn urinary proteome analysis in the evaluation and management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a cost-effectiveness study. World J Urol. 2009;27:379
  4. Josephson S. Antenatally detected, unilateral dilatation of the renal pelvis: a critical review (1. Postnatal non-operative treatment 20 years on—is it safe?). Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36:243
  5. Mesrobian HG, Wang Tao, Halligan BD, et al. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry urinary proteome analysis discriminates between normal individuals and infants with grade 4 hydronephrosis secondary to UPJO. In: Presented at annual meeting of American Urological Association. Chicago, Illinois. April 25-30, 2009;
  6. Pisitkun T, Johnstone R, Knepper MA. Discovery of urinary biomarkers. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:1760
  7. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23:478
  8. Fefer S, Ellsworth P. Prenatal hydronephrosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006;53:429
  9. Gonzales PA, Pisitkun T, Hoffert JD, et al. Large-scale proteomics and phosphoproteomics of urinary exosomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:363
  10. Yu H, Wakim B, Li M, et al. Quantifying raft proteins in neonatal mouse brain by “tube gel” protein digestion label-free shotgun proteomics. Proteome Sci. 2007;24:5
  11. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D190
  12. Yates JR, Eng JK, McCormack , et al. Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal Chem. 1995;67:1426
  13. Medical College of Wisconsin Proteomics Center. Epitomize. http://proteomics.mcw.edu
  14. Hendrickson EL, Qiangwei X, Tiansong W, et al. Comparison of spectral counting and metabolic stable isotope labeling for use with quantitative microbial proteomics. Analyst. 2006;131:1335
  15. Shapiro E. Clinical implications of genitourinary embryology. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19:427
  16. Chevalier RL. Obstructive nephropathy: towards biomarker discovery and gene therapy. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006;3:157
  17. Kentsis A, Monigatti F, Dorff K, et al. Urine proteomics for profiling of human disease using high accuracy mass spectrometry. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2009;3:1052
  18. Haubitz M, Wittke S, Weissinger EM, et al. Urine protein patterns can serve as diagnostic tools in patients with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2005;67:2313
  19. Rossing K, Mischak H, Rossing P, et al. The urinary proteome in diabetes and diabetes-associated complications: new ways to assess disease progression and evaluate therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2008;2:997
  20. Thongboonkerd V. Practical points in urinary proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2007;6:3881
  21. Lee RS, Monigatti F, Lutchman M, et al. Temporal variations of the postnatal rat urinary proteome as a reflection of systemic maturation. Proteomics. 2008;8:1097
  22. Mesrobian HG, Wang T, Kaucic C, et al. The normal urinary proteome profile varies by age during the first year of life. In: Presented at annual meeting of American Academy of Pediatrics. Boston, Massachusetts. October 11-14, 2008;
  23. Kemperman RF, Horvatovich PL, Hoekman B, et al. Comparative urine analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and multivariate statistics: method development, evaluation, and application to proteinuria. J Proteome Res. 2007;6:194
  24. Rosen S, Peters CA, Chevalier RL, et al. The kidney in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a spectrum from normal to nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:1257
  25. Thongboonkerd V. Current status of renal and urinary proteomics: ready for routine clinical application?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:11
  26. Mischak H, Coon JJ, Novak J, et al. Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry as a powerful tool in biomarker discovery and clinical diagnosis: an update of recent developments. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2009;28:703

 Study received institutional review board approval (CHW 07/97, GC 421).

 Supplementary material for this article can be obtained at http://proteomics.mcw.edu/<http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-2.3.1b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=LBELFPAKMFDDDBMJNCELBAMJOJBDAA00&WebLinkReturn-=Full+Text%3dL%7cS.sh.15.17%7c0%7c00004032-201002000-00013&Full+Text+External+Link=http%3a%2f%2fproteomics.mcw.edu%2f>.

PII: S0022-5347(10)03056-9

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.061

The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 2 , Pages 709-714 , August 2010