« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 6
, Pages 2126-2127
, June 2010
Surgical Margins Following Urological Cancer Surgery and Clinical Outcomes—Does the United States Need Regional Centralization of Cancer Care?
References
- The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171
- Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol. 2007;178:2308
- Pathologic evaluation of radical cystectomy specimens: a cooperative group report. Cancer. 2004;100:2470
- Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence. BJU Int. 2009;103:327
- Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol. 2008;179:2158
- Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology. 2005;66:1245
- Do margins matter? (The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens). J Urol. 2008;179(suppl.):S47
- Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4671
- Regionalization of care: centralizing complex surgical procedures. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005;2:461
- Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. April 21, 2009;Epub ahead of print
PII: S0022-5347(10)03043-0
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.049
© 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 6
, Pages 2126-2127
, June 2010

