The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 6 , Pages 2126-2127 , June 2010

Surgical Margins Following Urological Cancer Surgery and Clinical Outcomes—Does the United States Need Regional Centralization of Cancer Care?

References 

  1. Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171
  2. Dotan ZA, Kavanagh K, Yossepowitch O, et al. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol. 2007;178:2308
  3. Herr HW, Faulkner JR, Grossman HB, et al. Pathologic evaluation of radical cystectomy specimens: a cooperative group report. Cancer. 2004;100:2470
  4. Bong GW, Ritenour CW, Osunkoya AO, et al. Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence. BJU Int. 2009;103:327
  5. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol. 2008;179:2158
  6. Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology. 2005;66:1245
  7. Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, et al. Do margins matter? (The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens). J Urol. 2008;179(suppl.):S47
  8. Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL, et al. Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4671
  9. Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Wei JT, et al. Regionalization of care: centralizing complex surgical procedures. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005;2:461
  10. Barocas DA, Mitchell R, Chang SS, et al. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. April 21, 2009;Epub ahead of print

PII: S0022-5347(10)03043-0

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.049

The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 6 , Pages 2126-2127 , June 2010