The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: III. Urinary Tract Infection Pattern
Purpose
We evaluated the difference in the febrile urinary tract infection rate in small children with dilating vesicoureteral reflux randomly allocated to 3 management alternatives, including antibiotic prophylaxis, endoscopic treatment or surveillance only as the control.
Materials and Methods
At 23 centers a total of 203 children were included in the study, including 128 girls and 75 boys 1 to younger than 2 years. Vesicoureteral reflux grade III in 126 cases and IV in 77 was detected after a febrile urinary tract infection (194) after prenatal screening (9). Voiding cystourethrography and dimercapto-succinic acid scintigraphy were done before randomization and after 2 years. The febrile urinary tract infection rate was analyzed by the intent to treat principle.
Results
We noted a total of 67 febrile recurrences in 42 girls and a total of 8 in 7 boys (p = 0.0001). There was a difference in the recurrence rate among treatment groups in girls with febrile infection in 8 of 43 (19%) on prophylaxis, 10 of 43 (23%) with endoscopic therapy and 24 of 42 (57%) on surveillance (p = 0.0002). In girls the recurrence rate was associated with persistent reflux after 2 years (p = 0.0095). However, reflux severity (grade III or IV) at study entry did not predict recurrence.
Conclusions
In this randomized, controlled trial there was a high rate of recurrent febrile urinary tract infection in girls older than 1 year with dilating vesicoureteral reflux at study entry but not in boys. Antibiotic prophylaxis and endoscopic treatment decreased the infection rate.
Key Words: kidney, urinary tract infections, vesico-ureteral reflux, cicatrix, antibiotic prophylaxis
Abbreviations and Acronyms: DMSA, 99mtechnetium dimercapto-succinic acid, RCT, randomized, controlled trial, UTI, urinary tract infection, VCU, voiding cystourethrography, VUR, vesicoureteral reflux
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Study received approval from research ethics committees at participating centers.
Supported by grants from the West Region, Sweden and Futurum, Jönköping County Council, Sweden.
PII: S0022-5347(10)00153-9
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.061
© 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

