The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 1 , Pages 274-279, July 2010

The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: I. Study Design and Study Population Characteristics

  • Per Brandström

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • ,
  • Elisabeth Esbjörner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
  • ,
  • Maria Herthelius

      Affiliations

    • Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
  • ,
  • Gundela Holmdahl

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • ,
  • Göran Läckgren

      Affiliations

    • Section of Urology, Uppsala University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
  • ,
  • Tryggve Nevéus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Uppsala University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
  • ,
  • Ulla Sillén

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • ,
  • Rune Sixt

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • ,
  • Ingrid Sjöberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Children's University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Eira Stokland

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • ,
  • Ulf Jodal

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • ,
  • Sverker Hansson

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden

Received 30 September 2009 published online 17 May 2010.

Purpose

We compared the rates of febrile urinary tract infection, kidney damage and reflux resolution in children with vesicoureteral reflux treated in 3 ways, including antibiotic prophylaxis, endoscopic therapy and surveillance with antibiotics only for symptomatic urinary tract infection.

Materials and Methods

Children 1 to younger than 2 years with grade III–IV reflux were recruited into this prospective, open, randomized, controlled, multicenter study and followed for 2 years after randomization. The main study end points were recurrent febrile urinary tract infection, renal status on dimercapto-succinic acid scintigraphy and reflux status. Outcomes were analyzed by the intent to treat principle.

Results

During a 6-year period 128 girls and 75 boys entered the study. In 96% of cases reflux was detected after urinary tract infection. The randomization procedure was successful and resulted in 3 groups matched for relevant factors. Recruitment was slower than anticipated but after patients were entered adherence to the protocol was good. Of the children 93% were followed for the intended 2 years without a treatment arm change. All except 2 patients completed 2-year followup scintigraphy.

Conclusions

Recruitment was difficult but a substantial number of children were entered and randomly assigned to 3 groups with similar basic characteristics. Good adherence to the protocol made it possible to address the central study questions.

Key Words: kidney, vesico-ureteral reflux, urinary tract infection, disease recurrence, disease progression

Abbreviations and Acronyms: DMSA, 99mtechnetium-dimercapto-succinic acid, RCT, randomized, controlled trial, UTI, urinary tract infection, VCU, voiding cystourethrography, VUR, vesicoureteral reflux

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received approval from research ethics committees at participating centers.

 Supported by Financial by grants from the West Region, Sweden and Futurum, Jönköping County Council, Sweden.

PII: S0022-5347(10)00142-4

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.055

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum , 18 November 2010

    The Journal of Urology January 2011 (Vol. 185, Issue 1, Page 365)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 184, Issue 1 , Pages 274-279, July 2010