The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: I. Study Design and Study Population Characteristics
Purpose
We compared the rates of febrile urinary tract infection, kidney damage and reflux resolution in children with vesicoureteral reflux treated in 3 ways, including antibiotic prophylaxis, endoscopic therapy and surveillance with antibiotics only for symptomatic urinary tract infection.
Materials and Methods
Children 1 to younger than 2 years with grade III–IV reflux were recruited into this prospective, open, randomized, controlled, multicenter study and followed for 2 years after randomization. The main study end points were recurrent febrile urinary tract infection, renal status on dimercapto-succinic acid scintigraphy and reflux status. Outcomes were analyzed by the intent to treat principle.
Results
During a 6-year period 128 girls and 75 boys entered the study. In 96% of cases reflux was detected after urinary tract infection. The randomization procedure was successful and resulted in 3 groups matched for relevant factors. Recruitment was slower than anticipated but after patients were entered adherence to the protocol was good. Of the children 93% were followed for the intended 2 years without a treatment arm change. All except 2 patients completed 2-year followup scintigraphy.
Conclusions
Recruitment was difficult but a substantial number of children were entered and randomly assigned to 3 groups with similar basic characteristics. Good adherence to the protocol made it possible to address the central study questions.
Key Words: kidney, vesico-ureteral reflux, urinary tract infection, disease recurrence, disease progression
Abbreviations and Acronyms: DMSA, 99mtechnetium-dimercapto-succinic acid, RCT, randomized, controlled trial, UTI, urinary tract infection, VCU, voiding cystourethrography, VUR, vesicoureteral reflux
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Study received approval from research ethics committees at participating centers.
Supported by Financial by grants from the West Region, Sweden and Futurum, Jönköping County Council, Sweden.
PII: S0022-5347(10)00142-4
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.055
© 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
Refers to erratum:
- Erratum , 18 November 2010

