The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 3 , Pages 850-851 , March 2010

Second Opinions in Pathology

References 

  1. McGowan L, Norris HJ. The mistaken diagnosis of carcinoma of the ovary. Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;173:211
  2. Epstein J, Walsh P, Sanfilippo F. Clinical and cost impact of second-opinion pathology: Review of prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20:851
  3. Coblentz TR, Mills SE, Theodorescu D. Impact of second opinion pathology in definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91:1284
  4. Harris M, Hartley AL, Blair V, et al. Sarcomas in North West England: I (Histopathological peer review). Br J Cancer. 1991;64:315
  5. Staradub VL, Messenger KA, Hao N, et al. Changes in breast cancer therapy because of pathology second opinions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:982
  6. Abt AB, Abt LG, Olt GJ. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119:514
  7. Mittler MA, Walters BC, Stopa EG. Observer reliability in histological grading of astrocytoma stereotactic biopsies. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:1091
  8. Kronz JD, Westra WH, Epstein JI. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital. Cancer. 1999;86:2426
  9. Troxel D. Error in surgical pathology. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:1092
  10. Gupta D, Layfield LJ. Prevalence of inter-institutional anatomic pathology slide review (A survey of current practice). Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:280
  11. Tomaszewski JE, Bear HD, Connally JA, et al. Consensus conference on second opinion in diagnostic anatomic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114:329

PII: S0022-5347(09)03255-8

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.064

The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 3 , Pages 850-851 , March 2010

Article Tools