The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 2 , Pages 546-551, February 2010

Impact of Hormonal Therapy on Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Combination Brachytherapy and External Beam Irradiation

  • Richard G. Stock

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1184 5th Ave., New York, New York 10025 (telephone: 212-241-7502; FAX: 212-410-7194)
  • ,
  • Swati Yamalachi
  • ,
  • Simon J. Hall
  • ,
  • Nelson N. Stone

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Prologics, Nihon-MediPhysics, IsoAid and Prostate Cancer Educational Council.

Departments of Radiation Oncology and Urology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York

Received 3 June 2009 published online 14 December 2009.

Purpose

We assessed the impact of androgen suppressive therapy on biochemical failure in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy and external beam irradiation.

Materials and Methods

From 1994 to 2006, 432 patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network were treated with low dose rate brachytherapy and external beam irradiation with or without 9 months of androgen suppressive therapy. Gleason score was 7 in 76% of cases and prostate specific antigen was 1.4 to 20 ng/ml (median 7.6). Of the patients 350 received androgen suppressive therapy and 82 did not. The biologically effective dose was 142 to 280 Gy2 (median 206). Followup was 23 to 155 months (median 56).

Results

The overall 8-year biochemical failure-free rate using the Phoenix definition in patients with vs without androgen suppressive therapy was 92% vs 92% (p = 0.4). The therapy had no significant impact on the biochemical failure-free rate in patients with Gleason score 7 (92% vs 90.5%, p = 0.55), prostate specific antigen 10 to 20 ng/ml (92% vs 100%, p = 0.32), T2b-T2c disease (89.5% vs 97%, p = 0.27) and more than 1 intermediate risk feature (90% vs 100%, p = 0.2).

Conclusions

We addressed the relative importance of radiation dose vs hormonal therapy for intermediate risk prostate cancer. With high biologically effective dose combination treatment androgen suppressive therapy did not have a significant impact on the 8-year biochemical failure-free rate. We question its routine use in this setting.

Key Words: prostate, prostatic neoplasms, brachytherapy, radiotherapy, androgen antagonists

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AST, androgen suppressive therapy, BED, biologically effective dose, D90, dose delivered to hottest 90% of prostate, EBRT, external beam irradiation, FFBF, freedom from biochemical failure, IMRT, intensity modulated radiation therapy, PSA, prostate specific antigen

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

PII: S0022-5347(09)02641-X

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.006

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum , 24 February 2010

    The Journal of Urology April 2010 (Vol. 183, Issue 4, Page 1650)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 2 , Pages 546-551, February 2010