The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 1 , Pages 27-33, January 2010

Contemporary Applications and Limitations of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Materials

  • Ricardo A. Natalin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Martin R. Prince

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, New York
    • Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Marc E. Grossman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, Columbia University, New York Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • David Silvers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, Columbia University, New York Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Jaime Landman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: 161 Fort Washington Ave., 11th Floor, New York, New York 10023 (telephone: 212-305-5630; FAX: 212-342-0694)

Received 5 April 2009 published online 13 November 2009.

Purpose

Improvements in imaging technologies have dramatically increased the ability to accurately diagnose and treat many urological disease processes. As urological patients often have chronic kidney disease, the well characterized nephrotoxicity of contrast induced nephropathy when using iodine based contrast materials has long been a concern. With the development of gadolinium based contrast agents it seemed that the concern regarding nephrotoxicity had been resolved. In 1997 a new disorder, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, appeared in patients with severe renal failure. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is a serious and potentially devastating disorder characterized by progressive thickening and hardening of the skin and other body tissues, and complicated by flexion contractures of the joints.

Materials and Methods

We performed a survey of the available literature on nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and magnetic resonance contrast media. We focused on mechanisms in the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis as well as its association with magnetic resonance contrast media, disease treatment and prevention, and its relevance to clinical urology.

Results

An association between nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium based contrast agents has been reported. Gadolinium is a toxic metal and it must be chelated to be a safe injectable contrast agent. It is now hypothesized that the majority of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis cases present with gadolinium based contrast agent exposure as the triggering factor, although this mechanism has not been elucidated. As gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is an important tool in the diagnosis and surveillance of urological diseases, the severe consequences of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis demand that practicing urologists understand and know its history and treatment strategies.

Conclusions

This review provides clarification of the gadolinium based contrast agent characteristics, tissue interactions that lead to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, prevention possibilities and available treatment options.

Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging, gadolinium, nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy, kidney failure, chronic

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CF, circulating fibrocytes, CKD, chronic kidney disease, ECP, extracorporeal photopheresis, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, GBCA, gadolinium based contrast agent, Gd, gadolinium, GFR, glomerular filtration rate, MRA, magnetic resonance angiography, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, NSF, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Nothing to disclose.

 Editor's Note: This article is the second of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 404 and 405.

PII: S0022-5347(09)02460-4

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.029

The Journal of Urology
Volume 183, Issue 1 , Pages 27-33, January 2010