Journal Home
Search for

Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 234-240 (January 2010)


View previous. 73 of 122 View next.

Long-Term Durability of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder

Scott A. MacDiarmidaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Kenneth M. Petersb, S. Abbas Shobeirid, Leslie S. Wooldridgec§, Eric S. Rovnere, Fah Che Leongf, Steven W. Siegelg⁎⁎, Susan B. Tateh††, Brian A. Feaginsi‡‡

Received 20 June 2009 published online 13 November 2009.

Refers to article:
Neuromodulation—Who, What, When, Where and Why? , 13 November 2009
Robert Mayer
The Journal of Urology
January 2010 (Vol. 183, Issue 1, Pages 17-18)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (97 KB)
Purpose

The Overactive Bladder Innovative Therapy Trial during phase 1 was a randomized trial demonstrating comparable effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and extended-release tolterodine during 12 weeks of therapy for frequency, nocturia, urgency, voided volume and urge incontinence episodes. In this second phase of the Overactive Bladder Innovative Therapy Trial we assessed the sustained therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in subjects with overactive bladder during 1 year.

Materials and Methods

After 12 weeks subjects randomized to weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation with Urgent® PC were offered an additional 9 months of treatment with assessments at 6 and 12 months from baseline. Outcome measures included voiding diary data, overactive bladder questionnaires, global response assessments and safety assessments.

Results

A total of 33 percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation responders continued therapy with 32 and 25 subjects completing 6 and 12 months of therapy, respectively. Subjects received a mean of 12.1 treatments during an average of 263 days, with a mean of 21 days (median 17) between treatments. Subject global response assessments showed sustained improvement from 12 weeks at 6 and 12 months, with 94% and 96% of responders, respectively. At 12 months mean improvements from baseline included a frequency of 2.8 voids daily (p <0.001), urge incontinence of 1.6 episodes daily (p <0.001), nocturia with 0.8 voids (p <0.05) and a voided volume of 39 cc (p <0.05). Overactive bladder questionnaire symptom severity was significantly improved from 12 weeks to 12 months (p <0.01) as well as from 6 to 12 months (p <0.01). No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

Statistically significant overactive bladder symptom improvement achieved with 12 weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatments demonstrates excellent durability through 12 months. The durability of response demonstrates the effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation as a viable, long-term therapy for overactive bladder.

a Alliance Urology Specialists, Greensboro, North Carolina

b William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan

c Mercy Health Partners, Muskegon, Michigan

d University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

e Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

f St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri

g Metro Urology, Woodbury, Minnesota

h University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

i Dallas Center for Pelvic Medicine, Dallas, Texas

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Alliance Urology Specialists, Bladder Control and Pelvic Pain Center, 509 N. Elam Ave., Second Floor, Greensboro, North Carolina 27403 (telephone: 336-274-1114; FAX: 336-232-5337)

 Supported by Uroplasty, Inc.

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 See Editorial on page 17.

 Financial interest and/or other relationship with Uroplasty, Pfizer, Watson, Astellas and Allergan.

 Financial interest and/or other relationship with Medtronic, Advanced Bionics, Boston Scientific, Allergan, Pfizer, Celgene and Trillium Therapeutics.

§ Financial interest and/or other relationship with Uroplasty, Astellas and Watson.

 Financial interest and/or other relationship with Uroplasty, Pfizer, Allergan, Tengion, Solace, Contura and Astellas.

 Financial interest and/or other relationship with Astellas.

⁎⁎ Financial interest and/or other relationship with AMS, Medtronic, Uromedica, Uroplasty and QiG.

†† Financial interest and/or other relationship with C. R. Bard.

‡‡ Financial interest and/or other relationship with Medtronic, AMS, Novartis, Allergan, Astellas and Boston Scientific.

PII: S0022-5347(09)02381-7

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160


View previous. 73 of 122 View next.