« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 5
, Pages 2232-2241
, November 2009
Prostate Specific Antigen Best Practice Statement: 2009 Update
References
- Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:11320
- Ries LA, Melbert D, Krapcho M et al: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2005. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/. Based on November 2007 SEER data submission posted to the SEER web site 2008.
- Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:175
- Impact of PSA screening on the incidence of advanced stage prostate cancer in the United States: a surveillance modeling approach. Med Decis Making. 2003;28:323
- Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977
- Survival associated with treatment vs. observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men. JAMA. 2006;296:2683
- Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1310
- Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1781
- Pathological and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA. 1994;271:368
- Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 2005;174:898
- Validation of the contemporary Epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer in European men. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1306
- Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:125
- Screening for prostate cancer without digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound: results after four years in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Prostate. 2006;66:625
- Prostate-specific antigen in hemodialysis patients and the influence of dialysis in its levels. Nephron. 2002;90:230
- . Intermethod differences in results for total PSA, free PSA, and percentage of free PSA. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:952
- Is prostate-specific antigen velocity useful in early detection of prostate cancer? (A critical appraisal of the evidence). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1510
- Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or lower. JAMA. 2005;294:66
- Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men (Establishment of age-specific reference ranges). JAMA. 1993;270:860
- Longitudinal evaluation of prostate specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease. JAMA. 1992;267:2215
- Age adjusted prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen velocity cut points in prostate cancer screening. J Urol. 2007;177:499
- Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1521
- Systematic review of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen velocity and doubling time as predictors for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:398
- Current age and race adjusted prostate specific antigen threshold values delay diagnosis of high grade prostate cancer. J Urol. 2007;178:1929
- Is the utility of prostate-specific antigen velocity for prostate cancer detection affected by age?. BJU Int. 2008;101:817
- Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic diseases. JAMA. 1998;279:1542
- Complexed prostate-specific antigen, complexed prostate-specific antigen density of total and transition zone, complexed/total prostate-specific antigen ratio, free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio, density of total and transition zone prostate-specific antigen: results of the prospective multicenter European trial. Urology. 2002;60:4
- Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239
- Baseline prostate-specific antigen compared with median prostate-specific antigen for age group as predictor of prostate cancer risk in men younger than 60 years old. Urology. 2006;67:316
- Age-specific reference ranges for prostate-specific antigen in black men. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:304
- Further analyses from the REDUCE prostate cancer risk reduction trial. J Urol, suppl. 2009;181:555;abstract LBA1
- The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:215
- Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1248
- . Estimation of treatment benefits when PSA screening for prostate cancer is discontinued at different ages. Urology. 2005;66:1038
- Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:185
- Pathological characteristics of prostate cancer detected through prostate specific antigen based screening. J Urol. 2006;175:902
- Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172:910
- Are pelvic computed tomography, bone scan, and pelvic lymphadenectomy necessary in the staging of prostatic cancer?. Br J Urol. 1995;75:778
- The prostatic specific antigen era is alive and well: prostatic specific antigen and biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;174:1276
- . Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a summary of the literature. J Urol. 2004;171:2122
- . The role of lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005;2:336
- Adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer – a new standard?. Eur Urol. 2008;54:528
- Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association prostate guidelines for localized prostate cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007;177:540
- Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3973
- Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:327
- Definitions of biochemical failure that best predict clinical failure in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation alone: a multi-institutional pooled analysis. J Urol. 2005;173:797
- PSA kinetics provide improved prediction of survival in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Urology. 2008;72:903
- Prostate-specific antigen nadir and cancer-specific mortality following hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen failure. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6556
- Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs. observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2008;299:2760
- Salvage radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes and long-term oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. J Urol. 2006;176:2025
- Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005;294:433
- Surrogate end point for prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1376
This document is being reprinted as submitted without editorial or independent peer review by the Editors of The Journal of Urology®.
The complete document is available at http://www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care/clinical-guidelines/main-reports/psa09.pdf.
Requests for reprints: Guidelines Department, American Urological Association, 1000 Corporate Blvd., Linthicum, Maryland 21090.
PII: S0022-5347(09)01955-7
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.093
© 2009 American Urological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 5
, Pages 2232-2241
, November 2009

