The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 5 , Pages 2242-2249, November 2009

Men Older Than 70 Years Have Higher Risk Prostate Cancer and Poorer Survival in the Early and Late Prostate Specific Antigen Eras

  • Leon Sun

      Affiliations

    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Arthur A. Caire

      Affiliations

    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Cary N. Robertson

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with EDAP-Technomed and Cytogen.
  • ,
  • Daniel J. George

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc., Astra Zeneca, Roche, Cougar, Wyeth, Genentech, Bayer, Sanofi-Aventis and Molecular Insight.
  • ,
  • Thomas J. Polascik

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Galil.
  • ,
  • Kelly E. Maloney

      Affiliations

    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Philip J. Walther

      Affiliations

    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Danielle A. Stackhouse

      Affiliations

    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Benjamin D. Lack

      Affiliations

    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • David M. Albala

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Applied Medical, Sanofi-Aventis and GlaxoSmithKline.
  • ,
  • Judd W. Moul

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Division of Urologic Surgery and Duke Prostate Center, Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 3707, Durham, North Carolina 27710 (telephone: 919-684-5057; FAX: 919-684-8794)
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Sanofi-Aventis, Astra Zeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Theralogix.

Duke Prostate Center and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Received 12 March 2009 published online 16 September 2009.

Purpose

We clarified whether men older than 70 years have a higher risk of prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras.

Materials and Methods

A cohort of 4,561 men who underwent radical prostatectomy were stratified into 3 age groups (younger than 60, 60 to 70 and older than 70 years), and early and late prostate specific antigen eras based on the year of surgery (before 2000 and 2000 or later). Race, body mass index, prostate specific antigen, prostate weight, tumor volume, pathological Gleason sum, pathological tumor stage, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and surgical margin status were submitted for univariate and multivariable analyses against the previously mentioned groups. Survivals (prostate specific antigen recurrence, distant metastasis and disease specific death) were compared among the 3 age groups using univariate and multivariable methods.

Results

Compared with younger age groups (younger than 60, 60 to 70 years) men older than 70 years had a higher proportion of pathological tumor stage 3/4 (33.0 vs 44.3 vs 52.1%, p <0.001), pathological Gleason sum greater than 7 (9.5% vs 13.4% vs 17.2%, p <0.001) and larger tumor volume (3.7 vs 4.7 vs 5.2 cc, p <0.001). Pathological Gleason sum in men older than 70 years did not differ between the early and late prostate specific antigen eras (p = 0.071). Men older than 70 years had a higher risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence, distant metastasis and disease specific death on univariate (p <0.05) but not multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Men older than 70 years had higher risk disease and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras. Pathological Gleason sums did not change between the 2 eras. Patient age was an important variable in prostate specific antigen screening, biopsy, treatment and prognosis.

Key Words: age factors, prostate-specific antigen, early detection of cancer, survival

Abbreviations and Acronyms: BMI, body mass index, PSA, prostate specific antigen

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 Supported by research funds from the Committee for Urologic Research, Education, and Development (CURED) of Duke University.

 Editor's Note: This article is the second of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 2538 and 2539.

PII: S0022-5347(09)01763-7

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.034

The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 5 , Pages 2242-2249, November 2009