The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 4 , Pages 1582-1587, October 2009

Temporary Segmental Renal Artery Occlusion Using Reverse Phase Polymer for Bloodless Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

  • Alireza Moinzadeh

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and requests for reprints: Robotic Surgery, Institute of Urology, Urologic Oncology, Lahey Clinic, 41 Mall Rd., Burlington, Massachusetts 01805 (telephone: 781-744-8334; FAX: 781-744-5429
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive Surgical.
  • ,
  • Sebastian Flacke
  • ,
  • John A. Libertino
  • ,
  • John Merhige

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Pluromed.
  • ,
  • Jean-Marie Vogel

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive Surgical.
  • ,
  • Katy Lyall

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive Surgical.
  • ,
  • Curtis W. Bakal
  • ,
  • Peter N. Madras

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Pluromed.

Lahey Clinic, Burlington and Pluromed, Inc., Woburn, Massachusetts, and Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, California

Received 18 January 2009 published online 17 August 2009.

Purpose

Renal vascular clamping with ensuing warm ischemia is typically needed during robotic or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We developed a technique for angiographic delivery of the novel intra-arterial reverse thermoplastic polymer LeGoo-XL™ that allows temporary selective vascular occlusion with normal perfusion of the remaining kidney.

Materials and Methods

Eight pigs underwent a total of 16 selective angiographic occlusions of the lower pole segmental artery using gel polymer. The technical feasibility of 2 hemostatic techniques, perfusion hemostasis and local plug formation, was assessed in 4 pigs each. Selective ischemia time was recorded and the vascular occlusion site was noted radiographically and laparoscopically. The feasibility of reversing the polymer from solid back to liquid state to allow reperfusion was determined. Pathological analysis of the kidney was completed in these acute model pigs. In the last 2 cases lower pole robotic partial nephrectomy was done using the da Vinci® surgical system.

Results

Selective lower pole ischemia was achieved in all 8 cases. Perfusion hemostasis yielded an inconsistent duration of occlusion (zero to greater than 60 minutes). Vascular occlusion time using local plug formation was more reliable (17 to 30 minutes) with consistent ability to reverse the plug to liquid state by cold saline flush. Two lower pole robotic partial nephrectomies were completed with minimal blood loss.

Conclusions

We developed a reliable technique of angiographic delivery of gel polymer for temporary vascular occlusion of selective renal artery branches using local plug formation. Ongoing studies are under way to assess technique consistency and the long-term effects of the polymer.

Key Words: kidney, nephrectomy, robotics, laparoscopy, polymers

Abbreviations and Acronyms: LP, local plug formation, PH, perfusion hemostasis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional animal care and use committee approval.

 Supported by Grant 1R43DK079481-01 from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases awarding component and Lahey Clinic Robert E. Wise Foundation.

 Study contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

PII: S0022-5347(09)01464-5

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.009

The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 4 , Pages 1582-1587, October 2009