The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 3 , Pages 998-1004, September 2009

How Physician and Patient Perceptions Differ Regarding Medical Management of Stone Disease

  • Karim Bensalah

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Altug Tuncel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Jay D. Raman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Aditya Bagrodia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Margaret Pearle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
    • The Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Cook Urological and Percutaneous Systems Inc.
  • ,
  • Yair Lotan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, Texas 75390-9110 (telephone: 214-648-0483; FAX: 214-648-8786)

Received 30 December 2008 published online 21 July 2009.

Purpose

We compared patient and urologist perceptions regarding the medical management of stone disease.

Materials and Methods

A total of 159 patients were prospectively interviewed. Patients were asked 3 questions concerning subjective tolerance of stone passage and surgical intervention weighed against the use of daily preventive medication. The same questions were sent to members of the Endourological Society.

Results

Mean ± SD patient age was 51 ± 14 years. Recurrent stone formers comprised 72% of patients and 76% had undergone a prior surgical procedure while 43% were taking prophylactic medication. Overall 81% and 88% of patients responded that they would rather take medication than tolerate a single stone event at home or in the emergency room, respectively. Likewise 92% of patients stated that they would prefer daily medication compared to any surgical procedure. Among 61 urologists 26%, 38% and 18% responded that patients would likely tolerate 1, 2 or an unlimited number of stone passages at home, respectively, before agreeing to take medication. Of the urologists 66% estimated that patients would tolerate up to 2 acute stone events requiring an emergency room visit before starting medication. In addition 20%, 31% and 33% of urologists presumed that patients would accept the need for surgery annually, every other year or every third year rather than take medication.

Conclusions

Most patients with stones will consider preventive medical therapy to avoid recurrent pain or a surgical procedure. In contrast, most urologists perceive that patients prefer to avoid medication even if it means tolerating several acute stone events and/or surgical procedures.

Key Words: urinary calculi, health care surveys, medication therapy management, urolithiasis

Abbreviations and Acronyms: QOL, quality of life

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 See Editorial on page 826.

 Editor's Note: This article is the third of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 1238 and 1239.

PII: S0022-5347(09)01165-3

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.025

Refers to article:

  • Are We Correctly Managing Urinary Calculi? , 17 July 2009

    Brian R. Matlaga
    The Journal of Urology September 2009 (Vol. 182, Issue 3, Pages 826-827)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 182, Issue 3 , Pages 998-1004, September 2009