The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 4 , Pages 1606-1614 , April 2009

Prostate Specific Antigen Testing Among the Elderly—When To Stop?

  • Edward M. Schaeffer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology, Marburg 134, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, Maryland 21287 (telephone: 410-502-2733; FAX: 410-955-0833)
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Covidien.
  • ,
  • H. Ballentine Carter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Anna Kettermann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Stacy Loeb

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Luigi Ferrucci

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Research Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Patricia Landis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Bruce J. Trock

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • E. Jeffrey Metter

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Research Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Nothing to disclose.

Received 14 August 2008

  • Image Result

    Selection criteria for study population. High risk pCA definition 1—men who died of prostate cancer. High risk pCA definition 2—men with PSA 20 ng/ml or greater (12), Gleason score 8 or greater (5), o

    Selection criteria for study population. High risk pCA definition 1—men who died of prostate cancer. High risk pCA definition 2—men with PSA 20 ng/ml or greater (12), Gleason score 8 or greater (5), or prostate cancer as underlying cause of death (18). BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia.

  • Image Result
    Kernel density plot of PSA distribution for NHANES data (broken line) and BLSA (solid line) data for ages 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B), 70 to 79 (C) and 80 years or older (D). Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smir

    Kernel density plot of PSA distribution for NHANES data (broken line) and BLSA (solid line) data for ages 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B), 70 to 79 (C) and 80 years or older (D). Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for comparison.

  • Image Result
    Relationship between PSA and age for subjects without prostate cancer (dots), subjects with high risk prostate cancer who died of disease (closed circles), those with PSA greater than 20 ng/ml or Glea

    Relationship between PSA and age for subjects without prostate cancer (dots), subjects with high risk prostate cancer who died of disease (closed circles), those with PSA greater than 20 ng/ml or Gleason score 8 or more (open circles), and those with prostate cancer not considered high risk (triangles). Each mark represents PSA at subject visit so that subject could be represented more than once. For simplicity figure does not show data on subjects without high risk prostate cancer who did not have PSA information before age 75 years. Lower right panel represents study group (PSA less than 3.0 ng/ml and older than 75 years).

  • Image Result
    Probability of death from prostate cancer (A). For example, probability of death from prostate cancer in subject with PSA 3 ng/ml or greater after age 70 to 75 years was approximately 7%. Probability

    Probability of death from prostate cancer (A). For example, probability of death from prostate cancer in subject with PSA 3 ng/ml or greater after age 70 to 75 years was approximately 7%. Probability of high risk prostate cancer (B) (death from prostate cancer, or PSA 20 ng/ml or more, or Gleason score 8 or more).

  • Image Result
    Probability plot of death (A) or development of high risk prostate cancer (B) at age 75 years with PSA cut points as indicated along x-axis. For example, probability of life threatening prostate cance

    Probability plot of death (A) or development of high risk prostate cancer (B) at age 75 years with PSA cut points as indicated along x-axis. For example, probability of life threatening prostate cancer developing in subject with PSA less than 3 ng/ml was approximately 3.4%. For each of PSA cut points 95% CIs were determined using bootstrap approach. Note confidence intervals for probability of high risk disease with PSA greater than 3.5 ng/ml do not overlap with confidence intervals for lower PSAs.

  • Image Result
    Kaplan-Meier estimate of time to death from prostate cancer (A) or high risk prostate cancer (B) from first subject visit after age 75 years. Time to diagnosis of high risk prostate cancer was not sig

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of time to death from prostate cancer (A) or high risk prostate cancer (B) from first subject visit after age 75 years. Time to diagnosis of high risk prostate cancer was not significantly different between PSA categories of 3 ng/ml or more (p = 0.634). Time to diagnosis of high risk prostate cancer differed significantly for PSA less than 3 vs 3 ng/ml or greater (p = 0.019). PSA less than 3 (solid line), 3 to 3.9 (broken line) and 4 to 10 (dot dash line) ng/ml were measured at visit after age 75 years.

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging.

 See Editorial on page 1534.

 Editor's Note: This article is the first of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 1970 and 1971.

PII: S0022-5347(08)03280-1

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.117

The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 4 , Pages 1606-1614 , April 2009