The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 4 , Pages 1635-1641, April 2009

A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer

  • Scott E. Eggener

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
    • Recipient of a National Institutes of Health Ruth Kirchstein National Research Service Award (T32-CA82088-06)
  • ,
  • Alex Mueller

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Ryan K. Berglund

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Raj Ayyathurai

      Affiliations

    • University of Miami, Miami, Florida
    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Cindy Soloway

      Affiliations

    • University of Miami, Miami, Florida
  • ,
  • Mark S. Soloway

      Affiliations

    • University of Miami, Miami, Florida
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with SpecTrum, Cell Genesys and GE Healthcare.
  • ,
  • Robert Abouassaly

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Eric A. Klein

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Steven J. Jones

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Pfizer, Cook, Abbott and Endocare.
  • ,
  • Chris Zappavigna

      Affiliations

    • University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • ,
  • Larry Goldenberg

      Affiliations

    • University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • ,
  • Peter T. Scardino

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • James A. Eastham

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Bertrand Guillonneau

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Division of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 353 East 68th St., New York, New York 10021 (telephone: 646-422-4406)

Received 25 August 2008 published online 23 February 2009.

Purpose

For select men with low risk prostate cancer active surveillance is more often being considered a management strategy. In a multicenter retrospective study we evaluated the actuarial rates and predictors of remaining on active surveillance, the incidence of cancer progression and the pathological findings of delayed radical prostatectomy.

Materials and Methods

A cohort of 262 men from 4 institutions met the inclusion criteria of age 75 years or younger, prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less, clinical stage T1–T2a, biopsy Gleason sum 6 or less, 3 or less positive cores at diagnostic biopsy, repeat biopsy before active surveillance and no treatment for 6 months following the repeat biopsy. Active surveillance started on the date of the second biopsy. Actuarial rates of remaining on active surveillance were calculated and univariate Cox regression was used to assess predictors of discontinuing active surveillance.

Results

With a median followup of 29 months 43 patients ultimately received active treatment. The 2 and 5-year probabilities of remaining on active surveillance were 91% and 75%, respectively. Patients with cancer on the second biopsy (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.23–4.06, p = 0.007) and a higher number of cancerous cores from the 2 biopsies combined (p = 0.002) were more likely to undergo treatment. Age, prostate specific antigen, clinical stage, prostate volume and number of total biopsy cores sampled were not predictive of outcome. Skeletal metastases developed in 1 patient 38 months after starting active surveillance. Of the 43 patients undergoing delayed treatment 41 (95%) are without disease progression at a median of 23 months following treatment.

Conclusions

With a median followup of 29 months active surveillance for select patients appears to be safe and associated with a low risk of systemic progression. Cancer at restaging biopsy and a higher total number of cancerous cores are associated with a lower likelihood of remaining on active surveillance. A restaging biopsy should be strongly considered to finalize eligibility for active surveillance.

Key Words: prostatic neoplasms, biopsy, treatment outcome

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AS, active surveillance, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, PSA, prostate specific antigen, RP, radical prostatectomy

 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 See Editorial on page 1534.

PII: S0022-5347(08)03272-2

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.109

Refers to article:

  • Prostate Specific Antigen Screening and Active Surveillance in the Elderly , 23 February 2009

    Badrinath R. Konety
    The Journal of Urology April 2009 (Vol. 181, Issue 4, Pages 1534-1535)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 4 , Pages 1635-1641, April 2009