The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 4 , Pages 1658-1664, April 2009

Prostogram Predicted Brachytherapy Outcomes are Not Universally Accurate: An Analysis Based on the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience With 125Iodine Brachytherapy

  • Steven J. Frank

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 97, Houston, Texas 77030 (telephone: 713-563-2364; FAX: 713-563-2366)
  • ,
  • Lawrence B. Levy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Deborah A. Kuban

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Calypso Medical and Amgen.
  • ,
  • Andrew K. Lee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Rajat J. Kudchadker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Teresa L. Bruno

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Marco van Vulpen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • David A. Swanson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Received 8 August 2008 published online 23 February 2009.

Purpose

Many clinicians use Prostogram data to advise patients selecting prostate cancer therapy. We examined whether the Prostogram accurately predicted recurrence at 5 years in patients treated with 125I brachytherapy at 1 tertiary cancer center.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 208 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated with a permanent 125I implant without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy at 1 tertiary cancer center during 1998 to 2006. In each patient the Prostogram brachytherapy formula was used to calculate 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival probability based on clinical stage, Gleason sum score, prostate specific antigen and the receipt or not of external beam radiotherapy. Recurrence was defined as clinical relapse, death from disease, posttreatment androgen deprivation therapy, secondary treatments administered before prostate specific antigen failure or biochemical recurrence based on the Kattan modification of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition of biochemical recurrence after external beam radiation therapy. Patients were divided into quartiles based on Prostogram predicted 5-year recurrence-free survival probability and mean probability was compared to the actual 5-year recurrence-free survival rate in each quartile. Harrell's concordance statistic was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the nomogram.

Results

Actual 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were superior to Prostogram predicted probabilities, including 89% vs 80%, 87% vs 86%, 100% vs 89% and 100% vs 94% in quartiles 1 to 4, respectively. Harrell's concordance value was 0.487 (95% CI 0.369–0.605), indicating that the predictive accuracy of the nomogram in our patients was less than 50%.

Conclusions

The Prostogram did not predict recurrence after permanent prostate brachytherapy in this series. Institutional variability requires that clinicians be cautious when using the Prostogram to counsel patients about the probability of success after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Key Words: prostate, brachytherapy, prostatic neoplasms, nomograms, mortality

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer, ASTRO, American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, C, concordance, PSA, prostate specific antigen

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received M. D. Anderson Cancer Center institutional review board approval.

PII: S0022-5347(08)03264-3

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.101

The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 4 , Pages 1658-1664, April 2009