The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 3 , Pages 1082-1090, March 2009

Laterality Alone Should Not Drive Selection of Candidates for Hemi-Ablative Focal Therapy

  • Basir Tareen
  • ,
  • Guilherme Godoy
  • ,
  • Alex Sankin
  • ,
  • Steve Temkin
  • ,
  • Herbert Lepor

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Med Reviews and US HIFU.
  • ,
  • Samir S. Taneja

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: NYU Urology Associates, 150 East 32nd St., Suite 200, New York, New York 10016 (telephone: 646-825-6321; FAX: 646-825-6399)
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with GTX, Envisioneering and GlaxoSmithKline.

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York

Received 23 June 2008 published online 16 January 2009.

Purpose

Because many investigators have suggested that ideal candidates for focal therapy are those with unilateral prostate cancer, we evaluated whether these men are at decreased risk for adverse pathological and oncological outcomes.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the charts of 1,458 consecutive patients who underwent open radical prostatectomy, as performed by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into 311 with unilateral (group 1) and 1,147 with bilateral (group 2) disease on final surgical pathology. They were also substratified by clinical risk into low risk (prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml, clinical stage less than T2b or Gleason score less than 7) and high risk groups. The groups were compared with respect to extracapsular extension, seminal vesical invasion, percent of tumor involvement, pathological Gleason score and biochemical recurrence.

Results

Compared to patients with bilateral disease those with unilateral disease had a lower rate of extracapsular extension (p = 0.004), seminal vesical invasion (p = 0.003), greater than 10% tumor involvement (p <0.001) and Gleason score 7 or greater (p <0.001). At a median followup of 36 months 8.3% and 16.7% of the men in groups 1 and 2, respectively, experienced biochemical recurrence (p = 0.001). Low risk disease was more prevalent in those with unilateral disease than in those with bilateral disease. Of men with low risk disease the risk of adverse pathological features/biochemical recurrence did not differ between groups 1 and 2.

Conclusions

Although men with unilateral prostate cancer have more favorable oncological outcomes than those with bilateral prostate cancer, this appears to be due to the higher prevalence of low risk disease. While focality/laterality may direct the method of subtotal gland treatment, clinical risk features may be adequate to select candidates for focal therapy.

Key Words: prostate, prostatic neoplasms, functional laterality, risk, outcome assessment (health care)

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ECE, extracapsular extension, HAT, hemi-ablative therapy, LAT, lesion ablative therapy, PSA, prostate specific antigen, RP, radical prostatectomy, STAT, subtotal gland ablative therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 Supported by the Bruce and Cynthia Sherman Fellowship in Urologic Oncology (BT, GG).

PII: S0022-5347(08)03003-6

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.155

The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 3 , Pages 1082-1090, March 2009