Journal Home
Search for

Volume 181, Issue 3, Pages 1076-1081 (March 2009)


View previous. 43 of 150 View next.

The Commonly Performed Nerve Sparing Total Prostatectomy Does Not Acknowledge the Actual Nerve Courses

Karl-Dietrich SievertCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jörg Hennenlotter, Ines A. Laible, Bastian Amend, Udo Nagele, Arnulf Stenzl

Received 19 May 2008 published online 15 January 2009.

Purpose

Published postoperative functional data have revealed insufficient nerve preparation for nerve sparing total prostatectomy. In this anatomical study we evaluated the distribution and quantity of periprostatic nerve tissue remaining on the nerve sparing aspect, which might aid in a more objective and accurate evaluation of postoperative function.

Materials and Methods

A total of 47 whole mount serial sections of unilateral nerve sparing total prostatectomy specimens of 10 patients were stained with protein gene product 9.5 and evaluated. The extracapsular nerves were counted and classified into 2 primary groups, including greater than 200 and 200 μm or less. Mean values and percents of the nerve sparing aspects were compared to their corresponding nonnerve sparing side.

Results

Compared to the nonnerve sparing side 54% of nerves greater than 200 μm and 56% of those less than 200 μm remained on the nerve sparing side of the prostate. Only on the posterolateral aspect did significantly less nerve tissue remain vs that on the contralateral nonnerve sparing side (17% greater than 200 μm and 44% 200 μm or less, p = 0.01 and 0.09, respectively). Of the 3 prostate levels (base, mid and apex) the highest decrease in nerves greater than 200 and 200 μm or less was noted at the apex (28% and 39%), of which the posterolateral sector had the most effective nerve sparing (10% and 18%, respectively).

Conclusions

Common nerve sparing total prostatectomy provides the possibility to preserve around 55% of all periprostatic nerve fibers focused on the posterolateral location, especially at the apex (80% to 90% nerve sparing). However, it does not consider the actual course of the nerve fibers. To further improve the clinical outcome the actual nerve courses must be considered to preserve the nerve continuum. These findings suggest modification of the nerve sparing technique.

Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany (telephone: +49 7071 29 84081; FAX: +49 7071 29 5092)

 Equal study contribution.

PII: S0022-5347(08)03002-4

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.154


View previous. 43 of 150 View next.