« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 1
, Pages 11-12
, January 2009
Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy—Is it Time to Abandon Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy?
References
- . Urologic Diseases of America Project: Urologic Diseases in America Project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173:848
- . Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?. J Endourol. 2002;16:477
- Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis–initial results. J Urol. 2001;166:2072
- . Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol. 2006;175:1742
- . Ureteroscopic management of intrarenal calculi. J Urol. 1998;159:1139
- . Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1995;153:588
- . What is important to patients receiving extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for urinary tract calculi?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004;86:432
- . Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int. 2001;88:675
- . The role of ureteral stent placement in the prevention of Steinstrasse. J Endourol. 1999;13:151
- . Incorporation of patient preferences in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a decision analytical view. J Urol. 1999;162:1913
PII: S0022-5347(08)02771-7
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.071
© 2009 American Urological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 1
, Pages 11-12
, January 2009

