The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 2 , Pages 462-471, February 2009

Defining and Reporting Erectile Function Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Challenges and Misconceptions

  • John P. Mulhall

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: 353 E 68th St., New York, New York 10021
    • Nothing to disclose.

Sexual and Reproductive Medicine Program, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Received 10 June 2008 published online 15 December 2008.

Purpose

The contemporary literature pertaining to erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy was evaluated. The limitations of this literature are discussed and recommendations are made for the reporting of erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Materials and Methods

A MEDLINE® literature search was conducted in February 2008 to review English language articles published on this subject from 2000 onward. The key elements in defining and reporting erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy that were explored included 1) study population factors, 2) population demographics, 3) means of data acquisition, 4) variability in questionnaire use, 5) temporal considerations, 6) baseline erectile function status, 7) defining adequate erectile function, and the concepts of 8) quality and 9) consistency of erection.

Results

The incidence of reported erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy is extremely discrepant. The rates of erectile dysfunction appear to be higher in multicenter, multisurgeon series compared to single center, single surgeon series. A total of 24 articles were culled from the literature, which are believed to be representative of the literature in this area. There was great variation in the nature of the populations studied, how data were acquired and reported, and how baseline and postoperative adequate erectile function was defined.

Conclusions

This review studies the strengths and weaknesses of the literature on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy, and makes some general recommendations for investigating and reporting erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Key Words: erectile dysfunction, prostatectomy, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, questionnaires, research design

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ED, erectile dysfunction, EF, erectile function, EPIC, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire, IIEF, International Index of Erectile Function, PCOS, prostate cancer outcomes study, PDE5i, PDE5 inhibitor, RP, radical prostatectomy, SHIM, Sexual Health Inventory for Men

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Editor's Note: This article is the first of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 928 and 929.

PII: S0022-5347(08)02734-1

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.047

The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 2 , Pages 462-471, February 2009