The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 2 , Pages 472-479, February 2009

How to Use a Clinical Practice Guideline

  • Philipp Dahm

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Health Science Center, Box 100247, Room M2-204, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0247 (telephone: 352-273-6815; FAX: 352-273-7515)
    • Equal study contribution.
  • ,
  • Lawrence L. Yeung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • Equal study contribution.
  • ,
  • Michele Gallucci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Italian National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Simone

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
  • ,
  • Holger J. Schünemann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Italian National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy

Received 5 August 2008 published online 15 December 2008.

Purpose

Leading organizations increasingly recognize clinical practice guidelines as an important approach in promoting an evidence-based clinical practice of urology. In light of their considerable clinical, economic and medicolegal impact, guideline users should be confident that the guidelines were rigorously developed and address relevant patient questions. In this article we outline a practical approach for critically appraising a clinical practice guideline.

Materials and Methods

We outline a 3-step approach to the assessment of a clinical practice guideline that answers the questions of whether the recommendations are valid, what the recommendations are and whether they will help in the treatment of an individual patient.

Results

To determine the adequacy of a clinical practice guideline, urologists should carefully review the rigor of the development process and its content. Important questions that relate to the validity of a guideline are whether, for specific questions, all important management options and outcomes were considered, and whether there was an explicit and sensible process to identify, select and combine all relevant evidence. Clinical practice guidelines should formally grade the quality of the available evidence for a given clinical question and outline a formal process of how the recommendations were derived. Value judgments made in the guideline development process about the relative importance of the potential benefits and harms of a given health care intervention should be made transparent to the reader. The recommendations made should be practical and should address important clinical issues. Furthermore, their strength should be graded to reflect the underlying uncertainty about the evidence and the values applied in the guideline development process.

Conclusions

The systematic approach presented in this article will allow urologists to critically appraise clinical practice guidelines. Determining the validity of the recommendations, understanding the recommendations and assessing their applicability to patients are 3 fundamental steps toward an evidence-based approach to using clinical practice guidelines.

Key Words: practice guidelines as topic, evidence-based medicine

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AUA, American Urological Association

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Nothing to disclose.

 Editor's Note: This article is the second of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 928 and 929.

PII: S0022-5347(08)02727-4

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.041

The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 2 , Pages 472-479, February 2009