The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 1 , Pages 42-47, January 2009

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Central Tumors: Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications

Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel

Received 27 April 2008 published online 13 November 2008.

Purpose

We report our experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for central tumors compared to peripheral tumors to analyze the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach to these complex cases.

Materials and Methods

Between October 2002 and July 2007, 212 patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. In 53 patients the tumor was central and in 159 it was peripheral. The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data, the type and incidence of complications, and the quality of excision in terms of surgical margin status were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Mean estimated blood loss (320 and 360 ml, respectively, p >0.05) and mean operative time (126 and 118 minutes, respectively, p >0.05) were similar in the central and peripheral tumor groups. Mean warm ischemia time in the central tumor group was longer (37 and 28 minutes, respectively, p <0.05) but median time was similar (30 and 29 minutes, respectively, p >0.05). The open conversion rate was significantly lower in the study group (1% vs 5.6%, p <0.05). The urological complication rate was similar in the 2 groups (9.4% vs 8.4%, p >0.05). However, different types of complications developed in each group. Four patients (7.5%) with central tumors had late hematuria (arterial pseudoaneurysm) and only 1 (1.9%) had a urine leak. Central tumors were larger (3.2 vs 2.5 cm) and more frequently malignant (94% vs 82%, p >0.05). Positive surgical margins were diagnosed in 0% vs 5% of cases (p <0.05).

Conclusions

Provided that there is adequate laparoscopic expertise the outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for central tumors is comparable to that of peripheral tumors. The main major complication in this group was late onset hematuria, which necessitated angiographic embolization. This facility should be available at centers where these advanced procedures are performed.

Key Words: kidney, kidney neoplasms, laparoscopy, nephrectomy, warm ischemia

Abbreviations and Acronyms: LPN, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, WIT, warm ischemia time

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 For another article on a related topic see page 387.

PII: S0022-5347(08)02432-4

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.014

Refers to article:

  • Comparative Study of In Vivo Lymphatic Sealing Capability of the Porcine Thoracic Duct Using Laparoscopic Dissection Devices , 17 November 2008

    Geoffrey N. Box, Hak J. Lee, Jose B. Abraham, Leslie A. Deane, Erick R. Elchico, Corollos A. Abdelshehid, Reza Alipanah, Michael B. Taylor, Lorena Andrade, Robert A. Edwards, James F. Borin, Elspeth M. McDougall, Ralph V. Clayman
    The Journal of Urology January 2009 (Vol. 181, Issue 1, Pages 387-391)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 181, Issue 1 , Pages 42-47, January 2009