The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 6 , Pages 2323-2329, December 2008

Evaluating Outcomes of Enterocystoplasty in Patients With Spina Bifida: A Review of the Literature

  • Charles D. Scales Jr.

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Tengion and Boston Scientific.
  • ,
  • John S. Wiener

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3831 DUMC, Durham, North Carolina 27710 (telephone: 919-684-6994; FAX: 919-681-5507)

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Received 29 May 2008 published online 20 October 2008.

Purpose

The urological complications of spina bifida impose a significant burden of disability and disease. Therapy is focused on the bladder to achieve the primary goals of maintaining normal renal function and attaining urinary continence. When medical management fails, surgical intervention, including enterocystoplasty, is frequently performed. However, practice patterns for enterocystoplasty show significant variation. Given this context, we examined outcome measures for enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida.

Materials and Methods

A MEDLINE® search was performed for articles on enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida. A total of 226 articles were identified and manually reviewed for relevant studies. Additional articles were selected based on a cited reference search.

Results

Almost all studies are retrospective, single institution case series of a relatively small number of patients. Few uniform or validated outcome measures for enterocystoplasty exist but reported measures typically include urodynamic, continence and satisfaction parameters. Interinstitutional variability in urodynamic measurements and in definitions of continence makes a comparison of outcomes difficult. The complication rate following enterocystoplasty is significant, well described and primarily related to the use of gastrointestinal segments for urine storage.

Conclusions

Medical management is the mainstay of neurogenic bladder therapy in the spina bifida population. Enterocystoplasty remains an important option to prevent or reverse upper tract deterioration, and/or improve or cure socially unacceptable incontinence despite poorly defined outcome measures. The development of appropriate and validated outcomes measures may enable more uniform, effective and safe urological care of patients with spina bifida.

Key Words: urinary bladder, neurogenic, spinal dysraphism, physician's practice patterns, gastrointestinal tract, transplants

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CIC, clean intermittent catheterization

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(08)02178-2

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.050

The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 6 , Pages 2323-2329, December 2008