The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 5 , Pages 1912-1917, November 2008

Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy by Tumor Size

  • Paul L. Crispen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Stephen A. Boorjian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Christine M. Lohse

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Thomas S. Sebo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • John C. Cheville

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Michael L. Blute

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Bradley C. Leibovich

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 (telephone: 507-774-3722; FAX: 507-284-4951)

Received 29 February 2008 published online 17 September 2008.

Purpose

Pathological evaluation of renal tumors treated with ablative and observational therapy is often limited and renal tumor size may be the only prognostic index available. We established long-term survival in patients following partial nephrectomy according to tumor size.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of our nephrectomy registry was performed to identify patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for localized (NX/N0/cM0) solid renal tumors 7 cm or less at our institution between 1970 and 2004. Overall, cancer specific, distant metastasis-free and local recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and stratified according to tumor size in all tumors treated and in patients with pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma.

Results

We identified 798 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for a 7 cm or less renal tumor. Median patient age was 63.5 years and median tumor size was 3.0 cm. Renal cell carcinoma was present in 637 tumors (80%). Overall, cancer specific, metastasis-free and local recurrence-free survival significantly decreased with each 1 cm increase in size in all tumors treated and in those with pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma (each p <0.05).

Conclusions

Partial nephrectomy is associated with durable cancer control in patients with renal tumors 7 cm or less, of which most represent renal cell carcinoma. Tumor size represents a valuable prognostic index in the absence of pathological evaluation of the entire tumor specimen. These results may be used for comparison against outcomes following ablative and observational therapy, for which tumor size is the only prognostic index available.

Key Words: kidney, carcinoma, renal cell, nephrectomy, kidney neoplasms, mortality

Abbreviations and Acronyms: RCC, renal cell carcinoma

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 For another article on a related topic see page 2196.

PII: S0022-5347(08)01850-8

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.047

Refers to article:

  • Disrupting the Interaction Between HOX and PBX Causes Necrotic and Apoptotic Cell Death in the Renal Cancer Lines CaKi-2 and 769-P , 22 September 2008

    Liesl Shears, Lynn Plowright, Kevin Harrington, Hardev S. Pandha, Richard Morgan
    The Journal of Urology November 2008 (Vol. 180, Issue 5, Pages 2196-2201)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 5 , Pages 1912-1917, November 2008