The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 5 , Pages 2005-2010, November 2008

Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Increases Subsequent Risk of Bladder and Rectal Cancer: A Population Based Cohort Study

  • Alan M. Nieder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Columbia University, Division of Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4306 Alton Rd., Suite 3014, Miami Beach, Florida 33140 (telephone: 305-674-2499; FAX: 305-674-2899)
  • ,
  • Michael P. Porter

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Urology & Epidemiology, University of Washington and the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Mark S. Soloway

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Received 25 February 2008 published online 17 September 2008.

Purpose

Pre-prostate specific antigen era series demonstrated an increased risk of bladder cancer and rectal cancer in men who received radiotherapy for prostate cancer. We estimated the risk of secondary bladder cancer and rectal cancer after prostate radiotherapy using a contemporary population based cohort.

Materials and Methods

We identified 243,082 men in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer between 1988 and 2003. We estimated the incidence rate, standardized incidence ratio and age adjusted incidence rate ratio of subsequent bladder cancer and rectal cancer associated with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and a combination of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy.

Results

The relative risk of bladder cancer developing after external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy-brachytherapy compared to radical prostatectomy was 1.88, 1.52 and 1.85, respectively. Compared to the general United States population the standardized incidence ratio for bladder cancer developing after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy-brachytherapy was 0.99, 1.42, 1.10 and 1.39, respectively. The relative risk of rectal cancer developing after external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy-brachytherapy compared to radical prostatectomy was 1.26, 1.08 and 1.21, respectively. The standardized incidence ratio for rectal cancer developing after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy-brachytherapy was 0.91, 0.99, 0.68 and 0.86, respectively.

Conclusions

Men who receive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer have an increased risk of bladder cancer compared to patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and compared to the general population. The risk of rectal cancer is increased in patients who receive external beam radiotherapy compared to radical prostatectomy. Patients should be counseled appropriately regarding these risks.

Key Words: prostatic neoplasms, urinary bladder neoplasms, rectal neoplasms, radiotherapy, prostatectomy

Abbreviations and Acronyms: BC, bladder cancer, BT, brachytherapy, CaP, prostate cancer, CaPSURE™, Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor, EBRT, external beam radiotherapy, EBRT-BT, external beam radiotherapy-brachytherapy, ICD-O-3, International Statistical Classifications of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition, IMRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy, IRR, incidence rate ratio, PSA, prostate specific antigen, RC, rectal cancer, RP, radical prostatectomy, SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, SIR, standardized incidence ratio

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(08)01841-7

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.038

The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 5 , Pages 2005-2010, November 2008