The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 3 , Pages 836-843, September 2008

Clinical Correlates of Renal Angiomyolipoma Subtypes in 209 Patients: Classic, Fat Poor, Tuberous Sclerosis Associated and Epithelioid

  • Brian R. Lane

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Hakan Aydin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Teresa L. Danforth

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Ming Zhou

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Erick M. Remer

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Andrew C. Novick

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Steven C. Campbell

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Section of Urological Oncology, Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Desk A100, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 (telephone: 216-444-5595; FAX: 216-636-0770).
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer and Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Received 22 January 2008 published online 16 July 2008.

Purpose

Angiomyolipomas classically present radiographically as fat containing lesions but some fail to demonstrate fat content. Histologically confirmed angiomyolipomas uniformly follow a benign course but rare epithelioid variants of angiomyolipoma can recur and metastasize. We investigated the clinical, radiographic and histological characteristics of each angiomyolipoma subtype.

Materials and Methods

Pertinent data were recorded for 209 patients surgically treated for angiomyolipoma in 219 kidneys from 1981 to 2007. Classic and fat poor angiomyolipomas were classified radiographically based on the presence or absence of fat and classified histologically based on the presence of triphasic, monophasic or epithelioid histology.

Results

Median radiographic size was 3.2, 4.9 and 10 cm in patients with a single angiomyolipoma (59% of patients), multiple angiomyolipomas and tuberous sclerosis (probable or definite), respectively. In these 3 groups 65%, 47% and 33% of lesions were not suspected radiographically (fat poor angiomyolipoma). Fat poor angiomyolipomas were more commonly single, smaller and in older patients. Triphasic histology was evident in 76% of angiomyolipomas with 16% demonstrating a predominance of 1 component and 8% containing epithelioid features. Despite potentially aggressive findings in 18% (eg presence within the perinephric fat, lymph node involvement) no angiomyolipoma recurred during a mean followup of 3.4 years (range 0 to 24). A total of 28 (13%) patients with angiomyolipoma had concomitant renal cell carcinoma.

Conclusions

A surprisingly high number of resected angiomyolipomas was not suspected radiographically indicating the importance of precise radiographic characterization to minimize nephrectomy for fat poor angiomyolipoma, which should remain a research priority. In this sizeable single institution series no triphasic, monophasic or epithelioid angiomyolipoma recurred despite potentially aggressive findings in a substantial proportion of cases.

Key Words: kidney neoplasms, angiomyolipoma, pathology, tuberous sclerosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AML, angiomyolipoma, CT, computerized tomography, IQR, interquartile range, MR, magnetic resonance, RCC, renal cell carcinoma, TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Editor's Note: This article is the second of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 1196 and 1197.

PII: S0022-5347(08)01277-9

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.041

The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 3 , Pages 836-843, September 2008