The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 2 , Pages 444-450, August 2008

Management of Ureteral Obstruction Due to Advanced Malignancy: Optimizing Therapeutic and Palliative Outcomes

  • Erik Kouba
  • ,
  • Eric M. Wallen
  • ,
  • Raj S. Pruthi

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and requests for reprints: Division of Urologic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2140 Bioinformatics Building, CB No. 7235, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 (telephone: 919-966-2574; FAX: 919-966-0098).

Division of Urologic Surgery and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Received 18 November 2007 published online 11 June 2008.

Purpose

Treatment of ureteral obstruction due to advanced abdominal or pelvic malignancy is a clinical challenge. We discuss improvements and modern day outcomes in the palliative treatment of patients with ureteral obstruction by antegrade or retrograde ureteral decompression. Also, potential areas of clinical investigation involving ureteral stent improvement and pharmacological management of relief of symptoms resulting from ureteral obstruction are discussed.

Materials and Methods

A literature search was performed using the Entrez-PubMed® database. All relevant literature on ureteral obstruction, advanced malignancy and nephrostomy, ureteral stent and associated topics concerning palliative care and quality of life were reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Presenting symptoms are varied and depend on the acuity of the underlying problem. Mechanisms underlying the pain and symptoms of extrinsic ureteral compression have not fully been explored but they may include prostaglandin and renin-angiotensin pathways with medical interventions potentially directed at such therapeutic targets. Progressive obstructive uropathy may likely lead to clinical manifestations, such as uremia, electrolyte imbalances and persistent urinary tract infections, if obstruction is not bypassed. New approaches to antegrade and retrograde stenting, and the evaluation of new stent materials may help minimize the complications and side effects of such procedures. Unfortunately the finding of ureteral obstruction due to malignancy carries a poor prognosis with a resulting median survival of 3 to 7 months. This prognosis highlights the importance of maintaining quality of life in these patients.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with symptoms of ureteral obstruction due to advanced malignancy should be informed of the therapeutic options in the context of the poor prognosis. In the meantime research is needed to find methods of urinary diversion and pharmacological intervention for symptomatic relief without compromising quality of life in patients at the end of life.

Key Words: ureter, ureteral obstruction, neoplasms, quality of life, stents

Abbreviations and Acronyms: COX, cyclooxygenase, NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, PCN, percutaneous nephrostomy, QOL, quality of life

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 See Editorial on page 435.

 Editor's Note: This article is the first of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 790 and 791.

PII: S0022-5347(08)00937-3

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.008

Refers to article:

  • The Undoing of Ureteral Obstruction From Malignancy—Who and How? , 11 June 2008

    J. Stuart Wolf
    The Journal of Urology August 2008 (Vol. 180, Issue 2, Pages 435-436)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 180, Issue 2 , Pages 444-450, August 2008