The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 6 , Pages 2103-2110, June 2008

Animal Models of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

  • Adonis Hijaz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Pfizer.
  • ,
  • Firouz Daneshgari

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Karl-Dietrich Sievert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Margot S. Damaser

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., ND20, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 (telephone: 1-216-444-1103; FAX: 1-216-444-9198).

Received 18 June 2007 published online 18 April 2008.

Purpose

Urinary incontinence affects 40% of women in the United States and stress urinary incontinence accounts for a large portion of affected patients. As defined by the International Continence Society, stress urinary incontinence is the involuntary leakage of urine upon effort, exertion, sneezing or coughing. Since the ultimate success of long-term management for any condition is based on an understanding of its pathophysiology, and because the pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence is incompletely defined, animal models have recently been developed to better understand stress urinary incontinence and develop novel treatment alternatives.

Materials and Methods

Several animal models for urethral dysfunction have emerged in the last few years, including those based on pathophysiological theories of urethral sphincter dysfunction that were designed to simulate maternal birth trauma. Other models have focused on the creation of a durable model of dysfunction for investigating novel treatments.

Results

Since animals cannot express intent, these animal models have focused on measuring decreased urethral resistance. The most widely used methods are the sneeze test, the tilt table technique and the leak point pressure test. Newer techniques include abdominal leak point pressure, urethral pressure measurement and retrograde urethral perfusion pressure. In addition to the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, all methods measure the composite contribution to urethral resistance from smooth and striated muscle, urethral closure and connective tissue, although none measures intent.

Conclusions

We critically reviewed the different models of stress urinary incontinence and urethral dysfunction as well as the different methods of measuring urethral resistance.

Key Words: urethra, urinary incontinence, stress, female, urodynamics, models, animal

Abbreviations and Acronyms: bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor, EMG, electromyography, EUS, external urethral sphincter, LPP, leak point pressure, MDSC, muscle derived stem cell, OVX, ovariectomy, PLGA-ms, poly-lactic-glycolic acid microspheres, PNC, pudendal nerve crush, RUPP, retrograde urethral pressure profile, SUI, stress urinary incontinence, VD, vaginal distention

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by National Institutes of Health R21 DK070905, R21 DK070004 and RO1 HD038679, and the Rehabilitation Research and Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs and Cleveland Clinic.

PII: S0022-5347(08)00243-7

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.096

The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 6 , Pages 2103-2110, June 2008