The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 4 , Pages 1455-1460, April 2008

Establishing the Prevalence of Incontinence Study: Racial Differences in Women’s Patterns of Urinary Incontinence

  • Dee E. Fenner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Pelvic Floor Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Elisa R. Trowbridge

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Pelvic Floor Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: PO Box 800726, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0726 (telephone: 434-924-2103; FAX: 434-243-6329).
  • ,
  • Divya L. Patel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Pelvic Floor Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Nancy H. Fultz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Pelvic Floor Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Janis M. Miller

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Pelvic Floor Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Denise Howard

      Affiliations

    • Georgia Urogynecology, Fayetteville, Georgia
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Novartis and Novasys.
  • ,
  • John O.L. DeLancey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Pelvic Floor Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Johnson & Johnson.

Received 3 July 2007 published online 22 February 2008.

Purpose

We examine racial differences in urinary incontinence prevalence, frequency, quantity, type, and risk factors in a population based sample of community dwelling black and white women.

Materials and Methods

Women 35 to 64 years old were sampled from telephone records from 3 southeast Michigan counties. Women self-identifying as black or white race completed a telephone interview that assessed demographics, health history, lifestyle factors and urinary incontinence experience. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, factor analysis and multivariable logistic regression to determine adjusted odds of urinary incontinence. Estimates were weighted to reflect probability and nonresponse characteristics of the sample, and to increase generalizability of the findings.

Results

Interviews were completed by 1,922 black and 892 white women (response rate = 69%). The overall prevalence of urinary incontinence was 26.5%. By race, urinary incontinence prevalence was 14.6% for black women and 33.1% for white women (p <0.001). Among incontinent women there was no difference by race in the frequency of urinary incontinence. However, black women reported more urine loss per episode (p <0.05). A larger proportion of white women with incontinence (39.2%) reported symptoms of pure stress incontinence compared to black women (25.0%), whereas a larger proportion of black women (23.8%) reported symptoms of pure urge incontinence compared to white women (11.0%). Risk factors for urinary incontinence were generally similar for white and black women.

Conclusions

In this population based study we observed racial differences in prevalence, quantity and type of urinary incontinence. Frequency of and risk factors for urinary incontinence were generally similar for white and black women.

Key Words: urinary incontinence, epidemiology, continental population groups, risk factors

Abbreviations and Acronyms: BMI, body mass index, EPI, Establishing the Prevalence of Incontinence, UI, urinary incontinence

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

 Supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant R01 HD 041123.

PII: S0022-5347(07)03090-X

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.051

Refers to erratum:

  • Establishing Prevalence of Incontinence Study , 21 May 2008

    The Journal of Urology July 2008 (Vol. 180, Issue 1, Page 415)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 4 , Pages 1455-1460, April 2008