The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 4 , Pages 1235-1242, April 2008

The Rationale for Inhibiting 5α-Reductase Isoenzymes in the Prevention and Treatment of Prostate Cancer

  • Donald J. Tindall

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 (telephone: 507-284-8553; FAX: 507-284-2384).
  • ,
  • Roger S. Rittmaster

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, and GlaxoSmithKline (RSR), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Received 9 May 2007 published online 18 February 2008.

Purpose

Androgens are essential for prostatic growth and development but they also have a significant role in prostate disease pathogenesis. Dihydrotestosterone, the primary prostatic androgen, is transformed from testosterone by types 1 and 2 5α-reductase and, thus, a potential therapeutic benefit could be achieved through the inhibition of 5α-reductase.

Materials and Methods

A literature review was performed using PubMed®/MEDLINE® and congress abstracts to examine evidence supporting the potential of 5α-reductase inhibitors in the primary prevention of prostate cancer and in limiting the progression of diagnosed disease.

Results

Prostate disease development is associated with increased expression of each 5α-reductase isoenzyme with over expression of type 1 of particular importance in prostate cancer development and progression. The 2 5α-reductase inhibitors currently clinically available are finasteride, a type 2 5α-reductase inhibitor, and dutasteride, a dual 5α-reductase inhibitor. Dual inhibition by dutasteride has been shown to translate into a greater degree and consistency of dihydrotestosterone suppression compared with finasteride. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial showed that finasteride significantly decreased the 7-year risk of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen 3.0 ng/ml or less, while the ongoing Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events study is assessing whether dutasteride decreases the risk of biopsy detectable prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen 2.5 to 10 ng/ml and a previous negative biopsy. Small-scale studies have demonstrated potential effects of 5α-reductase inhibition in prostate cancer treatment that warrant further investigation, while dutasteride use in men undergoing expectant treatment is also being examined.

Conclusions

The inhibition of 5α-reductase represents a valid target for prostate cancer risk reduction and treatment strategies. The greater suppression of dihydrotestosterone observed with agents that inhibit each 5α-reductase isoenzyme may translate into enhanced outcomes and studies are under way to test this hypothesis.

Key Words: prostate, prostatic neoplasms, cholestenone 5 alpha-reductase, androgens, dihydrotestosterone

Abbreviations and Acronyms: 5αR, 5α-reductase, ADI, androgen depletion independent, AR, androgen receptor, ARE, androgen response element, BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia, DHT, dihydrotestosterone, PCPT, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, PIN, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, PSA, prostate specific antigen, REDUCE, Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events, TA, transit amplifying

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(07)03074-1

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.033

Refers to erratum:

  • Inhibiting 5α-Reductase Isoenzymes for Prostate Cancer , 23 April 2008

    The Journal of Urology June 2008 (Vol. 179, Issue 6, Page 2490)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 4 , Pages 1235-1242, April 2008