The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 3 , Pages 827-831, March 2008

Artery Sparing Radical Prostatectomy—Myth or Reality?

  • John P. Mulhall

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Sexual Medicine Program, Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, New York 10021 (telephone: 646-422-4200; FAX: 212-988-0760).
  • ,
  • Fernando P. Secin
  • ,
  • Bertrand Guillonneau

Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Received 22 April 2007 published online 25 January 2008.

Purpose

Not all patients in whom the neurovascular bundles are preserved recover erectile function after radical prostatectomy. A significant proportion of these men have vascular abnormalities that can impact erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy. We describe the available evidence supporting the need to spare not only the nerves, but also the arteries to improve erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy.

Materials and Methods

A literature review was done to determine the available evidence supporting vascular insufficiency as a contributor to erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Results

There is no question that preservation of the cavernous nerves is key to erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy. In addition, it is believed that erectile tissue requires oxygenation to maintain its integrity, which can be significantly affected if the arteries irrigating the cavernous bodies are damaged intraoperatively, such as the accessory pudendal arteries. In approximately 1 of every 4 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy accessory pudendal arteries of different calibers are identified. Thus, accumulating evidence supports the concept that the accessory pudendal arteries have a role in erectile function and its recovery after radical prostatectomy and, furthermore, supports the idea that preserving the accessory pudendal arteries may contribute to erectile function recovery.

Conclusions

Based on the evidence at hand we believe that it is appropriate to build on the notion of nerve sparing radical prostatectomy by introducing the urological community to the concept of artery sparing radical prostatectomy in an attempt to make the urological community aware of the potential need to spare the accessory pudendal arteries. The crux of the difficulty is in deciding which arteries should be preserved and which may be sacrificed. Thus, defining the role of the accessory pudendal arteries in erectile function recovery requires intraoperative analysis of the functional role of these vessels.

Key Words: prostate, prostatectomy, arteries, nerves, penile erection

Abbreviations and Acronyms: APA, accessory pudendal artery, ED, erectile dysfunction, EF, erectile function, RP, radical prostatectomy, TGF-β, transforming growth factor, subunit β

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(07)02751-6

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.021

The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 3 , Pages 827-831, March 2008