The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 1 , Pages 34-45, January 2008

Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography of Urological Malignancies: An Update Review

  • Kirsten Bouchelouche

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Positron Emission Tomography and Cyclotron Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark (telephone: +45 4011 9660; FAX: +45 6590 6192).
  • ,
  • Peter Oehr

Positron Emission Tomography and Cyclotron Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bonn (PO), Bonn, Germany

Received 2 March 2007 published online 12 November 2007.

Purpose

Appropriate imaging in uro-oncology is a crucial component at primary diagnosis, followup and recurrence to achieve an accurate assessment of the disease and determine the most effective treatment. We summarize recent developments in positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for prostate, bladder and renal cancer.

Materials and Methods

The recent published literature on positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in uro-oncology was searched and reviewed.

Results

For prostate cancer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is not highly effective for primary diagnosis but it has a limited role in staging and recurrence detection. Promising results have been shown by 11C-choline, 18F-fluorocholine, 11C-acetate and 18F-fluoride. The role of 11C-methionine, 18F-fluoro-5-alpha-dihydrotestosterone and anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid remains to be elucidated. For bladder cancer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useful for identifying distant metastases but not for detecting primary tumors due to the urinary excretion of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. The role of 11C-choline and 11C-methionine remains to be evaluated further in clinical studies. For renal cancer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is of limited use for primary diagnosis but it has a role in staging and restaging of the disease. More clinical data are needed to investigate the roles of 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 18F-fluorothymidine.

Conclusions

Several advances in positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for urological cancer have been made in recent years. However, larger clinical trials are needed to establish the role of this imaging method for urological malignancy. In the near future the new radiotracers and further advancement in this imaging technique are expected to improve the performance of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in uro-oncology.

Key Words: prostate, urinary tract, carcinoma, transitional cell, carcinoma, renal cell, positron-emission tomography

Abbreviations and Acronyms: BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia, CT, computerized tomography, FACBC, fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid, FCH, fluorocholine, FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose, FDHT, fluoro-5-alpha-dihydrotestosterone, FLT, fluorothymidine, FMISO, fluoromisonidazole, MR, magnetic resonance, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, MRS, MR spectroscopy, NPV, negative predictive value, PET, positron emission tomography, PPV, positive predictive value, PSA, prostate specific antigen, RCC, renal cell carcinoma, SPECT, single photon emission CT, SUV, standardized uptake value, TRUS, transrectal ultrasound

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(07)02356-7

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.176

The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 1 , Pages 34-45, January 2008