The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 1 , Pages 28-33, January 2008

The Will Rogers Phenomenon in Urological Oncology

  • Ofer N. Gofrit

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, 5841 South Maryland Ave.-MC6038, Chicago, Illinois 60637 (telephone: 773-702-4807; FAX: 773-702-1001).
  • ,
  • Kevin C. Zorn
  • ,
  • Gary D. Steinberg

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Vysis, Bayer and Adolor/GSK.
  • ,
  • Gregory P. Zagaja

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive.
  • ,
  • Arieh L. Shalhav

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Misonix/Focus Surgery.

Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Received 16 February 2007 published online 12 November 2007.

Purpose

Improvement in the prognosis of patient groups due to stage or grade reclassification is called the Will Rogers phenomenon. We determined the significance of the Will Rogers phenomenon in urological oncology.

Materials and Methods

Studies referring to the Will Rogers phenomenon in urological oncology were identified through a MEDLINE® search. Samples of articles not referring to the phenomenon directly but likely to be biased by it, such as articles comparing contemporary data to historical controls, were also reviewed.

Results

In prostate cancer the Will Rogers phenomenon is the result of the late 1990s acceptance that Gleason scores 2 to 4 should not be assigned on prostate biopsy. Consequently grade inflation occurred and current readings are almost 1 Gleason grade higher compared to past readings of the same biopsy. The result is an illusion of improvement in grade adjusted prognosis. In bladder cancer the Will Rogers phenomenon arises from improvement in histopathological processing of cystectomy specimens enabling the identification of microscopic perivesical fat infiltration and lymph node metastases not recognized in the past. Up staging from pT2 to pT3 and N0 to N+ may partly explain the improved stage adjusted survival after radical cystectomy observed in contemporary series. The Will Rogers phenomenon may also explain the correlation between the total number of lymph nodes removed at radical cystectomy and survival. As more lymph nodes are removed the probability of identifying metastases and up staging to N+ increases.

Conclusions

Comparison of contemporary results to historical controls may be biased by the Will Rogers phenomenon. Ignoring the possibility of stage or grade reclassification may lead to erroneous conclusions.

Key Words: neoplasm staging, prognosis, classification

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CaP, carcinoma of the prostate, CT, computerized tomography, EBRT, external beam radiotherapy, NED, no evidence of disease, PSA, prostate specific antigen, RCC, renal cell carcinoma, WRP, Will Rogers phenomenon

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(07)02291-4

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.125

The Journal of Urology
Volume 179, Issue 1 , Pages 28-33, January 2008