The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 6 , Pages 2252-2259, December 2007

Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Detection

  • Dipen J. Parekh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and requests for reprints: Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, Texas 78284-7802 (telephone: 210-567-5640; FAX: 210-567-6868
  • ,
  • Donna Pauler Ankerst

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Dean Troyer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Sudhir Srivastava

      Affiliations

    • Early Detection and Research Network, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
  • ,
  • Ian M. Thompson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Received 20 January 2007 published online 15 October 2007.

Purpose

The limitations of prostate specific antigen as a biomarker for prostate cancer screening, characterized by low sensitivity for acceptable false-positive rates, are well known. New markers that differentiate indolent from aggressive cancers to decrease potential the over treatment of prostate cancer are needed. We reviewed current and potential biomarkers for prostate cancer detection.

Materials and Methods

A literature search was performed to identify established and emerging biomarkers for prostate cancer detection. Recent suggested guidelines by the Early Detection Research Network for phases of biomarker studies were interpreted for use in prostate cancer and the existing status of marker studies were reviewed with respect to these phases of study.

Results

Advances in high throughput bench research, including high dimensional genomic, proteomic and autoantibody signatures, have the potential to improve the operating characteristics of prostate specific antigen but they are undergoing reproducibility and multicenter validation studies. None of the prostate specific antigen derivatives or isoforms, such as prostate specific antigen density, velocity or percent complexed prostate specific antigen, improve operating characteristics enough to likely replace prostate specific antigen. Prostate stem cell antigen, alpha-methyl coenzyme-A racemase, PCA3, early prostate cancer antigen, human kallikrein 2 and hepsin are promising markers that are currently undergoing validation.

Conclusions

The process of discovering novel biomarkers to replace or augment the existing best marker, prostate specific antigen, requires standardized phases of evaluation and validation. Several biomarkers are currently on the cusp of initial validation studies.

Key Words: prostate, prostatic neoplasms, tumor markers, biological, validation studies [publication type], prostate-specific antigen

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AMACR, alpha-methyl coenzyme-A racemase, AUC, area below the ROC curve, BPSA, benign PSA, DRE, digital rectal examination, EDRN, Early Detection and Research Network, EPCA, early prostate cancer antigen, FPR, false-positive rate, GSTP-1, glutathione-S-transferase P1, HK2, human kallikrein, NCI, National Cancer Institute, NPV, negative predictive value, PCPT, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, PCR, polymerase chain reaction, proPSA, precursor PSA, PSA, prostate specific antigen, PSCA, prostate stem cell antigen, SELDI, surface enhanced laser desorption ionization, TOF, time of flight, TPR, positive rate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by NCI and EDRN Grant U01-CA86402, and a University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Institute for Integration of Medicine and Science Mentored Career Development Award (DJP).

PII: S0022-5347(07)02062-9

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.055

The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 6 , Pages 2252-2259, December 2007