The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 5 , Pages 1855-1859, November 2007

Vaginal Substitution: Attempts to Create the Ideal Replacement

  • John C. Thomas
  • ,
  • John W. Brock III

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Division of Pediatric Urology, Monroe Carell Jr. Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital, 4102 Doctor’s Office Tower, 2200 Children’s Way, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-9820 (telephone: 615-936-2228; FAX: 615-936-1061).

Division of Pediatric Urology, Monroe Carell Jr. Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee

Received 11 December 2006 published online 14 September 2007.

Purpose

Vaginal substitution may be necessary for vaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome), cloacal anomalies and certain intersex disorders or following pelvic exenterative surgery. The ideal method of vaginal replacement should provide a cosmetically acceptable, low maintenance vaginal substitute with minimal morbidity and excellent long-term function. We present the available literature on the various approaches to vaginal substitution, focusing on outcomes, complications and long-term durability in terms of sexual function.

Materials and Methods

We performed an extensive search of the medical literature for nonoperative and operative alternatives for vaginal replacement. We focused on surgical indications, complications, long-term sexual function if available, and inherent advantages and disadvantages of the specified technique.

Results

Popular methods of vaginal substitution include passive dilation, inlay skin grafts, rotational myocutaneous flaps and bowel substitute vaginoplasty. These methods have been modified to some extent, and carry inherent advantages and disadvantages. Reports in the literature show the inherent biases of the proponents of different methods.

Conclusions

There are many options for vaginoplasty. The ideal method is not currently known and depends on numerous factors including patient preparedness, surgeon experience, and patient and surgeon preference. Despite these issues, patients must be provided with nonoperative and operative options that address individual patient expectations, potential complications, long-term durability and long-term sexual function.

Key Words: urogenital abnormalities, vagina, dilatation, gynecologic surgical procedures, surgical flaps

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(07)01743-0

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.007

The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 5 , Pages 1855-1859, November 2007