The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 5 , Pages 1867-1874, November 2007

Decision Analysis and Markov Modeling in Urology

  • Michael H. Hsieh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Urologic Outcomes Research Group, University of California-San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: 400 Parnassus Ave., UFP, 6th Floor Crede Ambulatory Care Center, Box 0738, San Francisco, California 94143 (telephone: 415-476-6843).
  • ,
  • Maxwell V. Meng

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Urologic Outcomes Research Group, University of California-San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    • Program in Urologic Oncology, Urologic Outcomes Research Group, University of California-San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Received 14 December 2006 published online 14 September 2007.

Purpose

The process of decision making in medicine has become increasingly complex. This has developed as the result of increasing amounts of data, often without direct information or answers regarding a specific clinical problem. The use of mathematical models has grown and they are commonly used in all areas. We describe and discuss the application of decision analysis and Markov modeling in urology.

Materials and Methods

We define decision analysis and Markov models, providing a background and primer to educate the urologist. In addition, we performed a complete MEDLINE® database search for all decision analyses in all disciplines of urology, serving as a reference summarizing the current status of the literature.

Results

The review provides urologists with the ability to critically evaluate studies involving decision analysis and Markov models. We identified 107 publications using decision analysis or Markov modeling in urology. A total of 36 studies used Markov models, whereas the remainder used standard decision analytical models. All areas of urology, including oncology, pediatrics, andrology, endourology, reconstruction, transplantation and erectile dysfunction, were represented.

Conclusions

Decision analysis and Markov modeling are widely used approaches in the urological literature. Understanding the fundamentals of these tools is critical to the practicing urologist.

Key Words: urology, decision support techniques, Markov chains

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ANN, artificial neural networks, DA, decision analysis, EV, expected value, MM, Markov model, OP, open prostatectomy, QALY, quality-adjusted life years, QOL, quality of life, RAP, robotic assisted prostatectomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(07)01742-9

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.006

The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 5 , Pages 1867-1874, November 2007