The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages 1598-1601, October 2007

Nerve Sparing Ventral Clitoroplasty: Analysis of Clitoral Sensitivity and Viability

  • Jennifer Yang
  • ,
  • Diane Felsen
  • ,
  • Dix P. Poppas

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Institute for Pediatric Urology, Rodgers Family Professor of Pediatric Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th St., Box 94, New York, NY 10021 (telephone: 212-746-5337; FAX: 212-746-8065).

Institute for Pediatric Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York

published online 16 August 2007.

Purpose

Enlargement of the clitoris is often a prominent manifestation of virilizing congenital adrenal hyperplasia and other disorders of sexual development. Controversy persists regarding the viability and sensitivity of the clitoris following clitoroplasty. We present 51 consecutive cases of nerve sparing ventral clitoroplasty performed by a single surgeon.

Materials and Methods

Nerve sparing ventral clitoroplasty was performed in all patients. Postoperative evaluation for clitoral viability included gross examination and capillary perfusion testing. Patients older than 5 years were evaluated for clitoral sensory testing and vibratory sensory testing.

Results

A total of 51 patients 4 months to 24 years old (mean age ± SD 4.6 ± 6.8 years) with clitorimegaly underwent nerve sparing ventral clitoroplasty. Of the patients 41 had capillary perfusion testing of the clitoris, of whom all had a viable clitoris. Ten of the 41 patients underwent clitoral sensory testing. Patients reported an average degree of sensation of 3.6 ± 0.9 at the labia minora and 4.8 ± 0.4 at the clitoris. Nine of the 10 patients also underwent vibratory sensory testing. Average values for the introitus, clitoris, labia and thigh were 3.56, 1.61, 5.08, and 5.83, respectively. Mean time after surgery for the patients who underwent clitoral sensory testing/vibratory sensory testing was 2.0 ± 0.8 years. No variations in the sensitivity results were reported at followup in 2 patients.

Conclusions

To our knowledge this is the largest report of followup testing of clitoral viability and sensation after clitoroplasty. Continued long-term followup is ongoing to document long-term sexual function using this nerve sparing ventral approach for clitoroplasty.

Key Words: abnormalities, clitoris, adrenal hyperplasia, congenital, surgery, plastic

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CPT, capillary perfusion testing, CST, clitoral sensitivity testing, NSVC, nerve sparing ventral clitoroplasty

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received medical institution review board approval.

PII: S0022-5347(07)01335-3

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.097

The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages 1598-1601, October 2007