The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 2 , Pages 376-377 , August 2007

Radical Prostatectomy: A Current Perspective

References 

  1. Wiygul JB, Harris MJ, Dahm P. Early patient self-assessed outcomes of nerve-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;66:582
  2. Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Feischmann A, Thalmann GN, Schumacher M, Studer UE. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy–does it have an impact on urinary continence?. J Urol. 2006;176:189
  3. Narayan P, Konety B, Aslam K, Aboseif S, Blumenfeld W, Tanagho E. Neuroanatomy of the external urethral sphincter: implications for urinary continence preservation during radical prostate surgery. J Urol. 1995;153:337
  4. Rodriguez E, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Post-robotic prostatectomy urinary continence: characterization of perfect continence versus occasional dribbling in pad-free men. Urology. 2006;67:785
  5. Savoie M, Kim SS, Soloway MS. A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:1462
  6. Munding MD, Wessells HB, Dalkin BL. Pilot study of changes in stretched penile length 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2001;58:567
  7. Mulhall JP. Penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;96:472
  8. Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Ertuk E, Patel HRH. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences?. BJU Int. 2005;96:39
  9. Menon M, Shrivastava , Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology. 2005;66:101

PII: S0022-5347(07)01287-6

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.032

The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 2 , Pages 376-377 , August 2007

Article Tools