The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S42-S48, September 2007

Bone Directed Therapies for Prostate Cancer

  • Deborah A. Bradley

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Maha Hussain

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: 7314 CCGC, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0946 (telephone: 734-936-8906; FAX: 734-615-2719).
  • ,
  • Robert S. DiPaola

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
  • ,
  • Philip Kantoff

      Affiliations

    • Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

published online 18 July 2007.

Purpose

Bone is the most common site of metastatic disease in prostate cancer and the lead cause of significant morbidity. Preclinical and clinical studies have provided insight into the pathophysiology of bone metastases and the changes that occur in the bone microenvironment that result in a favorable site of growth for prostate cancer. We provide an overview of recent advances in understanding bone biology, and bone targeted therapy research and development.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed recent research findings related to the biology of bone metastases, approaches to targeting osteoclast function, approaches to targeting osteoblasts and advances in assessing the treatment response to bone targeted therapies in the context of prostate cancer management.

Results

To date targeting some of the key players in the bone microenvironment has not been associated with a significant antitumor effect or with meaningful clinical benefit in phase III randomized trials. A significant limitation in the development of bone targeted therapy has been the inability to objectively assess treatment response. Investigation of improved imaging techniques are ongoing to provide better treatment assessment and, therefore, allow more rapid drug screening and development.

Conclusions

It is our recommendation that future therapy development should be combination based, focusing on simultaneous targeting of multiple relevant pathways. Most important of all is the direct targeting of prostate cancer cells.

Key Words: prostate, prostatic neoplasms, bone and bones, neoplasm metastasis

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient of tumor water, ET, endothelin, FDG, fludeoxyglucose 18F, fDM, functional diffusion mapping, HR, hormone refractory, ITT, intent to treat, MMP, matrix metalloproteinase, MMPI, MMP inhibitor, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, OPG, osteoprotegerin, PCa, prostate cancer, PET, positron emission tomography, PSA, prostate specific antigen, RANK, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB, RANKL, RANK ligand, SRE, skeletal related event, TTP, time to progression

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant T32CA009357 (DAB).

PII: S0022-5347(07)01094-4

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.04.035

The Journal of Urology
Volume 178, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S42-S48, September 2007