The Journal of Urology
Volume 177, Issue 2 , Pages 644-648, February 2007

The Role of Computerized Tomographic Urography in the Initial Evaluation of Hematuria

  • Justin M. Albani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, 51 North 39th St., 266 Wright-Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 (telephone: 215-662-8699; FAX: 215-243-4649).
  • ,
  • Michael W. Ciaschini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Stevan B. Streem

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Brian R. Herts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Siemens Medical Solutions.
  • ,
  • Kenneth W. Angermeier

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with NDI Medical, Engineers and Doctors Inc. and Pfizer.

Received 9 May 2006

Purpose

We determined the usefulness of computerized tomographic urography for the initial evaluation of patients with hematuria as an alternative to excretory urography.

Materials and Methods

A total of 259 patients (140 men and 119 women), age range 20 to 100 (mean 59.4) years, underwent computerized tomographic urography for the evaluation of hematuria and were available for followup. A cohort of 253 patients (153 men, 100 women), age range 21 to 92 (mean 57.6) years, underwent conventional excretory urography and were evaluated for comparison.

Results

A source of hematuria was identified in 107 patients (41.3%) in the computerized tomographic urography cohort and in 103 patients (40.7%) in the excretory urography cohort. Computerized tomographic urography alone identified a source of hematuria in 25.5% of these patients with the most commonly diagnosed lesions being renal calculi (18.9%), ureteral calculi (2.7%) and renal pelvic masses (2.3%) in the upper tract (0.94 sensitivity), and bladder masses (8.1%), prostatic abnormalities (5.4%) and inflammatory disorders (3.5%) in the lower tract (0.40 sensitivity, 0.99 specificity). The overall detection rate (19.5%), most commonly diagnosed lesions, and lower urinary tract sensitivity and specificity were similar in the excretory urography cohort. However, excretory urography exhibited a markedly lower sensitivity in detecting upper tract lesions (0.50).

Conclusions

Computerized tomographic urography exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity than conventional excretory urography in detecting upper tract pathology (94.1% vs 50%). However, sensitivity for detecting lower tract lesions was low (40% or less), suggesting that computerized tomographic urography offers a comprehensive alternative to excretory urography but does not obviate the need for adjunctive cystourethroscopy for accurate evaluation of the lower urinary tract.

Key Words: tomography, x-ray computed, urography, hematuria

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CT, computerized tomography, CTU, computerized tomographic urography, IVP, excretory urography, NPV, negative predictive value, PPV, positive predictive value, RCC, renal cell carcinoma

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Editor’s Note: This article is the fifth of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 802 and 803.

PII: S0022-5347(06)02476-1

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.065

The Journal of Urology
Volume 177, Issue 2 , Pages 644-648, February 2007