The Journal of Urology
Volume 177, Issue 1 , Pages 39-49, January 2007

Questionnaires to Assess Urinary and Anal Incontinence: Review and Recommendations

  • K.N.L. Avery

      Affiliations

    • Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Rd., Bristol BS8 2PR, United Kingdom (telephone: +44 (0) 117 928 7233; FAX: +44 (0) 117 928 7325).
  • ,
  • J.L.H.R. Bosch

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • M. Gotoh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • ,
  • M. Naughton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, North Carolina
  • ,
  • S. Jackson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • S.C. Radley

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • L. Valiquette

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • J. Batista

      Affiliations

    • Urodynamics Unit, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • J.L. Donovan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Received 13 December 2005

Purpose

We reviewed and provide recommendations about the most scientifically robust and appropriate questionnaires for evaluating symptoms and the quality of life impact of urinary and/or anal incontinence, and vaginal and pelvic floor problems. We also investigated the use of these questionnaires in randomized, controlled trials of treatment strategies.

Materials and Methods

The Symptom and Quality of Life Committee of the International Consultation on Incontinence performed a systematic review of questionnaires related to urinary and anal incontinence, and vaginal and pelvic floor problems, searching MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library® and other electronic databases between 2001 and 2004.

Results

A total of 23 robust and relevant questionnaires could be recommended in clinical practice and research. The development of questionnaires to assess anal incontinence, and pelvic floor and vaginal problems has been limited with some promising measures but with none achieving the highest level of rigor. From 2001 to 2004 there were 150 published randomized trials of treatments for incontinence. Increasingly trials of incontinence are using recommended measures (38% of those for urinary incontinence and 22% of those for anal incontinence used the highest quality questionnaires in 2001 to 2004) but none of vaginal and pelvic floor problems used recommended questionnaires.

Conclusions

With increasing acknowledgment of the value of patient based assessment much attention has been given to the development of questionnaires to assess symptoms and quality of life. Sufficient measures are now available for urinary incontinence, and researchers and clinicians are encouraged to use the 18 achieving the highest level of rigor and their validated translations. In contrast, the development of questionnaires for anal incontinence and pelvic/vaginal problems is in its infancy and further study in this area is needed. Randomized trials of treatments for incontinence should use only questionnaires achieving the highest level of scientific rigor.

Key Words: bladder, urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, outcome assessment (health care), questionnaires

Abbreviations and Acronyms: BFLUTS, Bristol Female LUTS Questionnaire, FES, functional electrical stimulation, ICI, International Consultation on Incontinence, ICIQ, ICI Questionnaire, IIQ, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, I-QOL, QOL in persons with UI questionnaire, KHQ, King’s Health Questionnaire, LUTE, lower urinary tract exercise, LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms, OAB, overactive bladder, PF, pelvic floor, PFM, PF muscle, PFME, PFM exercises, PFMT, PFM training, QOL, quality of life, RCT, randomized, controlled trial, SEAPI-QMM, incontinence classification system, SF, Short Form, TVT, transvaginal tape, UDI, Urogenital Distress Inventory, UI, urinary incontinence, UISS, UI Severity Score, VAS, visual analog scale

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(06)02173-2

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.075

The Journal of Urology
Volume 177, Issue 1 , Pages 39-49, January 2007