The Journal of Urology
Volume 177, Issue 1 , Pages 123-127, January 2007

High Dose Rate Brachytherapy as a Boost for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

  • Thinh P. Phan

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Long Beach, California
  • ,
  • A.M. Nisar Syed

      Affiliations

    • Orange and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Radiation Oncology, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, 2801 Atlantic Ave., Long Beach, California 90806 (telephone: 562-933-0300; FAX: 562-933-0301).
  • ,
  • Ajmel Puthawala

      Affiliations

    • Orange and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California
  • ,
  • Anil Sharma

      Affiliations

    • Orange and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California
  • ,
  • Farhan Khan

      Affiliations

    • Orange and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California

Received 20 February 2006

Purpose

We report the outcome and toxicities of high dose rate brachytherapy as a boost for localized prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

Between 1996 and 2003, 309 patients with prostate carcinoma were treated with external beam radiation therapy and high dose rate brachytherapy. Furthermore, 36% of the patients received neoadjuvant/concurrent or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were stratified into 3 groups. Group 1 of 67 patients had Gleason score 6 or less, pretreatment prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less and clinical stage T2a or less. Group 2 of 109 patients had Gleason score 7 or greater, pretreatment prostate specific antigen greater than 10 ng/ml and clinical stage T2b or greater. Group 3 of 133 patients had 2 or more of these higher risk factors.

Results

At a median followup of 59 months the 5-year biochemical control rate, as defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology, was 86%, cause specific survival was 98% and overall survival was 91%. Biochemical control in stratified groups 1 to 3 was 98%, 90% and 78%, respectively. On univariate analysis risk group, pretreatment prostate specific antigen and Gleason score were significant predictors of biochemical control. However, on multivariate analysis only risk group and pretreatment prostate specific antigen were significant. Using the Common Toxicity Criteria scale there were 2 cases of grade 3 acute urinary toxicity. Regarding late side effects 4% of patients had grade 3 genitourinary toxicity and 1 had a grade 4 rectal complication.

Conclusions

External beam radiation therapy and high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer resulted in excellent biochemical control, cause specific survival and overall survival with minimal severe acute or late complications.

Key Words: prostate, prostatic neoplasms, brachytherapy, radiotherapy, toxicity

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ADT, androgen deprivation therapy, BC, biochemical control, BT, brachytherapy, CSS, cause specific survival, CT, computerized tomography, CTC, Common Toxicity Criteria, EBRT, external beam radiation therapy, ED, erectile dysfunction, GI, gastrointestinal, GS, Gleason score, GU, genitourinary, HDR-BT, high dose rate BT, KWS, Kiel University, William Beaumont and Seattle Prostate Institute, LBMCC, Long Beach Memorial Cancer Center, OS, overall survival, prePSA, pretreatment PSA, PSA, prostatic specific antigen

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5347(06)02150-1

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.109

The Journal of Urology
Volume 177, Issue 1 , Pages 123-127, January 2007