The Journal of Urology
Volume 176, Issue 1 , Pages 299-302, July 2006

Voiding Ability Using Propofol Sedation in Children Undergoing Voiding Cystourethrograms: A Retrospective Analysis

  • Paul A. Merguerian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Sections of Urology and Pediatric Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Section of Pediatric Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr., Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756 (telephone: 603-653-9882; FAX: 603-650-4985).
  • ,
  • Sean T. Corbett

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Sections of Urology and Pediatric Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
  • ,
  • Joseph Cravero

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire

Received 15 November 2005

Purpose

The ability of a child to void during cystourethrography is important in detecting vesicoureteral reflux. The potential effect of sedation on the capacity to void may impair our ability to detect vesicoureteral reflux. Since 2001, most voiding cystourethrograms at our institution have been performed with moderate sedation using propofol. To assess the impact of sedation on the ability of children to void, we retrospectively evaluated a group of patients who underwent sedated voiding cystourethrograms and compared them to a group undergoing nonsedated voiding cystourethrograms.

Materials and Methods

The nonsedated group consisted of children 2 to 8 years old who underwent voiding cystourethrography between 1996 and 2001. The sedated group consisted of children the same age who underwent voiding cystourethrography between 2002 and 2004. Patient characteristics, presenting symptoms, bladder capacity, emptying ability and diagnoses were recorded. Children were categorized as receiving sedation vs not receiving sedation. All sedated children received propofol deep sedation. Statistical analyses were performed using the 2-sided t test and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Of 544 charts reviewed 287 were within the age range defined. Of these children 85% were female. Sex was evenly matched between the sedated and nonsedated groups. Urinary tract infections (65%) and previous vesicoureteral reflux (25%) were the most common factors prompting voiding cystourethrography. Sedation was administered in 146 patients, of whom 80 (55%) were able to void to completion. Of the 141 patients who did not receive sedation 125 (89%) were able to void to completion (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Children who underwent voiding cystourethrography with sedation were less likely to void to completion. This finding may impair our ability to detect vesicoureteral reflux in children accurately. Large prospective studies are needed for better assessment of bladder emptying and sedation when performing voiding cystourethrography.

Key Words:  conscious sedation , urination , urination disorders , child

Abbreviations and Acronyms:  VCUG, voiding cystourethrogram , VUR, vesicoureteral reflux

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received institutional review board approval.

PII: S0022-5347(06)00584-2

doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00584-2

The Journal of Urology
Volume 176, Issue 1 , Pages 299-302, July 2006