The Journal of Urology
Volume 176, Issue 1 , Pages 132-136, July 2006

Effect of High and Low Calcium Diets on Stone Forming Risk During Liberal Oxalate Intake

  • Edward D. Matsumoto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Howard J. Heller

      Affiliations

    • Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Beverley Adams-Huet

      Affiliations

    • Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Center for Biostatistics and Clinical Science, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Linda J. Brinkley

      Affiliations

    • Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Charles Y.C. Pak

      Affiliations

    • Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Nothing to disclose.
  • ,
  • Margaret S. Pearle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., J8.106, Dallas, Texas 75390-9110 (telephone: 214-648-6853; FAX: 214-648-8786).
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Cook Urological Inc., Applied Medical, Boston Scientific and Percutaneous Systems, Inc.

Received 20 May 2005

Purpose

Recent studies suggest that a high calcium diet protects against calcium oxalate stone formation. We compared the effect of high and low calcium diets on urinary saturation of calcium oxalate during liberal oxalate intake.

Materials and Methods

A total of 10 healthy subjects (5 male, 5 female) participated in a 2-phase, randomized, crossover study comparing high (1,000 mg daily) and low (400 mg daily) calcium intake on a liberal oxalate diet (200 mg daily). During each phase subjects adhered to an instructed diet for 3 days followed by a controlled, metabolic diet for 4 days. Blood and 24-hour urine specimens collected on the last 2 days of each phase were analyzed for serum biochemistry studies and stone risk factors, respectively.

Results

Urinary calcium was higher (mean ± SD 171 ± 64 vs 124 ± 49 mg daily, p = 0.002) and oxalate was lower (25 ± 4.8 vs 27 ± 4 mg daily, p = 0.02) on the high vs low calcium diet. Overall, the urinary relative saturation ratio of calcium oxalate was higher on the high compared with the low calcium diet (3.3 vs 2.5, p <0.0001) even after adjusting for confounding variables.

Conclusions

In normal subjects urinary saturation of calcium oxalate was higher on a high calcium diet than a low calcium diet during liberal oxalate intake because the decrease in urinary oxalate did not overcome the effect of increased calcium. A high calcium diet during liberal oxalate intake may pose an increased risk of calcium oxalate stone formation.

Key Words:  calcium , oxalates , diet , kidney calculi

Abbreviations and Acronyms:  RSR, relative saturation ratio

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Study received Institutional Review Board approval.Supported by United States Public Health Service Grants M01-RR00633 and P01-DK20543 from the National Institutes of Health.Editor’s Note: This article is the fourth of 5 published in this issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 418 and 419.

PII: S0022-5347(06)00565-9

doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00565-9

The Journal of Urology
Volume 176, Issue 1 , Pages 132-136, July 2006