Journal Home
Search for

Volume 163, Issue 3, Pages 888-893 (March 2000)


View previous. 53 of 110 View next.

REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS

ROSEMARY BASSONCorresponding Author Information, JENNIFER BERMANCorresponding Author Information, ARTHUR BURNETTCorresponding Author Information, LEONARD DEROGATISCorresponding Author Information, DAVID FERGUSONCorresponding Author Information, JEAN FOURCROY, IRWIN GOLDSTEINCorresponding Author Information, ALESSANDRA GRAZIOTTINCorresponding Author Information, JULIA HEIMANCorresponding Author Information, ELLEN LAANCorresponding Author Information, SANDRA LEIBLUMCorresponding Author Information, HARIN PADMA-NATHANCorresponding Author Information, RAYMOND ROSENCorresponding Author Information, KATHLEEN SEGRAVESCorresponding Author Information, R. TAYLOR SEGRAVESCorresponding Author Information, RIDWAN SHABSIGHCorresponding Author Information, MARCALEE SIPSKICorresponding Author Information, GORM WAGNERCorresponding Author Information, BEVERLY WHIPPLECorresponding Author Information

Accepted 1 October 1999.

Purpose:

Female sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent but not well defined or understood. We evaluated and revised existing definitions and classifications of female sexual dysfunction.

Materials and Methods:

An interdisciplinary consensus conference panel consisting of 19 experts in female sexual dysfunction selected from 5 countries was convened by the Sexual Function Health Council of the American Foundation for Urologic Disease. A modified Delphi method was used to develop consensus definitions and classifications, and build on the existing framework of the International Classification of Diseases-10 and DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association, which were limited to consideration of psychiatric disorders.

Results:

Classifications were expanded to include psychogenic and organic causes of desire, arousal, orgasm and sexual pain disorders. An essential element of the new diagnostic system is the “personal distress” criterion. In particular, new definitions of sexual arousal and hypoactive sexual desire disorders were developed, and a new category of noncoital sexual pain disorder was added. In addition, a new subtyping system for clinical diagnosis was devised. Guidelines for clinical end points and outcomes were proposed, and important research goals and priorities were identified.

Conclusions:

We recommend use of the new female sexual dysfunction diagnostic and classification system based on physiological as well as psychological pathophysiologies, and a personal distress criterion for most diagnostic categories.

Corresponding Author InformationFinancial interest and/or other relationship with Affiliated Research Centers, Astra, Bayer AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Fournier Group, Glaxo Wellcome, Lilly/ICOS, Matrix Pharma, NexMed, NitroMed, Pentech, Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Canada Ltd., Pfizer UK, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Proctor & Gamble, Schering-Plough, Senetek, Shwarz-Pharma, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Syntec, Syntex, TAP Pharmaceuticals, Vivus and/or Zonagen.

 Supported by the Sexual Function Health Council of the American Foundation for Urologic Disease through educational grants provided by Affiliated Research Centers, Eli Lilly/ICOS Pharmaceuticals, Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc., Procter & Gamble, Schering-Plough, Solway Pharmaceuticals, TAP Pharmaceuticals and Zonagen.

PII: S0022-5347(05)67828-7


View previous. 53 of 110 View next.